Mayflower District Court
#state-of-mayflower-v-zaivatore-et-al
This is the start of #state-of-mayflower-v-zaivatore-et-al channel.
clerkFlow pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:05 p.m.
honkhonk 2025-03-18 01:43 a.m.
Assigned DOJ Prosecutor: @Funpark22
honkhonk used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-18 01:43 a.m. @honkhonk has added @Funpark22 to the case channel.
Case Modified
Funpark22 2025-03-18 09:04 a.m.
Gracias
Funpark22Gracias
sadoimpacto 2025-03-18 03:08 p.m.
You need to fix the CI. You don't restart counts when you name an additional defendant
sadoimpacto 2025-03-18 03:08 p.m.
Keep it in order. You can name two people in the same count or individually
sadoimpacto 2025-03-18 03:09 p.m.
But keep it numerical and don't break sequence
sadoimpacto 2025-03-18 03:09 p.m.
Also there's no need to call them defendant A and B, just name them
sadoimpacto 2025-03-18 03:09 p.m.
sadoimpacto 2025-03-18 03:09 p.m.
Here's an example
Funpark22 2025-03-18 04:47 p.m.
Alr
Funpark22 2025-03-18 10:48 p.m.@meowiitten
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:05 p.m.
Funpark22Click to see attachment.
sadoimpacto 2025-03-19 02:54 a.m. 
sadoimpacto 2025-03-19 02:55 a.m.
You don’t need to do stuff like that
sadoimpacto 2025-03-19 02:55 a.m.
The two clauses “without holding a state issued firearm” and “held a firearm yet did not have a MFOID” say the exact same thing
sadoimpacto 2025-03-19 02:56 a.m.
You only needed the first half
Maybe something like this:
“… possessed a firearm, to wit, an AR-15, without holding a state-issued firearms license.”(edited)
Maybe something like this:
“… possessed a firearm, to wit, an AR-15, without holding a state-issued firearms license.”(edited)
Funpark22 2025-03-19 08:56 a.m.
You want me to just remove the “to wit” sentence
Funpark22 2025-03-19 08:56 a.m.
?
Funpark22 2025-03-19 08:57 a.m.
We can see a firearm, we don’t know the type
Funpark22We can see a firearm, we don’t know the type
sadoimpacto 2025-03-19 09:18 a.m.
Then just say firearm
sadoimpactoThe two clauses “without holding a state issued firearm” and “held a firearm yet did not have a MFOID” say the exact same thing
sadoimpacto 2025-03-19 09:18 a.m.
But like I said, these say the same thing
sadoimpacto 2025-03-19 09:18 a.m.
You’re allowed to recite the elements of a statute if the elements themselves accomplish stating the offense
sadoimpacto 2025-03-19 09:18 a.m.
This is one of those scenarios
sadoimpactoThen just say firearm
Funpark22 2025-03-19 06:13 p.m.
I did
Funpark22 2025-03-19 11:17 p.m.
I’ll amend this again on Thursday of this week
sadoimpactoYou don’t need to do stuff like that
Funpark22Click to see attachment.
sadoimpacto 2025-03-20 10:15 p.m.
You don’t need the second thing
Funpark22 2025-03-20 10:15 p.m.
Second what
sadoimpacto 2025-03-20 10:15 p.m. 
sadoimpacto 2025-03-20 10:15 p.m.
You’re allowed to name two people in the same information
sadoimpacto 2025-03-20 10:16 p.m.
Either in the same count or separately
Funpark22 2025-03-20 10:16 p.m.
So you just want me to put J... at the top with the principal
sadoimpacto 2025-03-20 10:16 p.m.
No dude
sadoimpacto 2025-03-20 10:16 p.m.
Just put defendants at the top part
Funpark22 2025-03-20 10:16 p.m.
Like put his name up here
sadoimpacto 2025-03-20 10:16 p.m.
And then name who is being charged in each count
sadoimpactoJust put defendants at the top part
Funpark22 2025-03-20 10:16 p.m.
That's what I'm talking about^^^^
sadoimpactoAnd then name who is being charged in each count
Funpark22 2025-03-20 10:16 p.m.
I see
sadoimpacto 2025-03-20 10:17 p.m.
You can put two names in the same count, or charge them separately if it’s a separate offense(edited)
sadoimpacto 2025-03-20 10:17 p.m.
Like they did an act the other guy didn’t do
Funpark22 2025-03-20 10:17 p.m.
So like this
Funpark22 2025-03-20 10:17 p.m.
Every count describes the defendant attached
Funpark22 2025-03-20 10:17 p.m.
Remove that
Funpark22 2025-03-20 10:17 p.m.
removed*
sadoimpacto 2025-03-20 10:18 p.m.
Yeah that’s fine but I prefer defendants at the top
Funpark22 2025-03-20 10:18 p.m. 
sadoimpacto 2025-03-20 10:18 p.m.
And get rid of the stuff that says “as principal” and “as a co-conspirator”
sadoimpacto 2025-03-20 10:18 p.m.
I can imply who the principal and co-conspirator is
Funpark22 2025-03-20 10:18 p.m.
So you want Zai.. et al
Funpark22 2025-03-20 10:18 p.m.
Or zai... and jbell..
sadoimpacto 2025-03-20 10:18 p.m.
At the top it should make both defendants fully
sadoimpacto 2025-03-20 10:19 p.m.
You never put et al in a case caption
Funpark22 2025-03-20 10:19 p.m. 
sadoimpacto 2025-03-20 10:19 p.m.
That’s for clerks when they title a case
sadoimpacto 2025-03-20 10:19 p.m.
Yes
Funpark22 2025-03-20 10:19 p.m.
Good fuck
Funpark22 2025-03-20 10:19 p.m.
3rd time putting this in the system
Funpark22 2025-03-20 10:19 p.m.
For the record, this is my first time writing a ci with 2 defendants.
Funpark22 2025-03-20 10:20 p.m.
I appreciate you correcting me so I can not make the same mistakes again.
sadoimpacto 2025-03-21 09:20 a.m.
That’s better
sadoimpacto 2025-03-21 09:22 a.m.
Draft a summons
sadoimpacto 2025-03-21 09:22 a.m.Mayflower State Court System courts.clarkcounty.site Criminal Summons Form [MRCrP 3(3)] Page 1 of 1 Clark County Courts Discord District Court Clark County State of Mayflower, -against- tactical_pancakes, Defendant. Case... 
1
1sadoimpactoDraft a summons
Funpark22 2025-03-21 04:42 p.m.
Add @Nationgreat
Funpark22 2025-03-21 04:43 p.m.
He sent the summons to a sheriff deputy
Funpark22 2025-03-21 04:43 p.m.
To my knowledge
sadoimpacto used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-21 05:16 p.m. @meowiitten has added @JohnnyBellantoni to the case channel.
Case Modified
sadoimpacto 2025-03-21 05:17 p.m.@JohnnyBellantoni Before we proceed, I must ensure you understand your rights in this matter:
1. You have the right to remain silent. This means you do not have to speak or provide any information that could incriminate you.
2. You also have the right to have an attorney present during any questioning or legal proceedings. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you at no cost.
3. You have the right to a fair and public trial, where evidence will be presented, and witnesses can be called to testify on your behalf.
4. Furthermore, you have the right to confront witnesses against you, meaning you can question them in court.
5. Finally, you have the right to appeal any conviction or sentence imposed upon you.
JohnnyBellantoni 2025-03-21 05:18 p.m.@meowiitten I understand and have a lawyer ready Mr Hamilton
sadoimpacto used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-21 05:18 p.m. @meowiitten has added @huddy. to the case channel.
Case Modified
sadoimpacto 2025-03-21 05:18 p.m.@huddy.
JohnnyBellantoni 2025-03-21 05:18 p.m.
When will court be taking place?
sadoimpacto 2025-03-21 05:18 p.m.
I'm arraigning you right now
JohnnyBellantoni 2025-03-21 05:19 p.m.
Could we do it at a later time for I’m out right now?
sadoimpacto 2025-03-21 05:19 p.m.
It's on Discord so no
sadoimpacto 2025-03-21 05:19 p.m.
I'm just going to have you enter a plea
JohnnyBellantoni 2025-03-21 05:19 p.m.
Alright
huddy. 2025-03-21 05:19 p.m.
Howdy
sadoimpacto 2025-03-21 05:21 p.m.
This is State of Mayflower v. Zalvatore and JBellantoni, CR-88-25. The information is as follows, where you are charged in Counts Four and Five:
@JohnnyBellantoni @huddy.
In the name and by authority of the State of Mayflower, comes forth the State to seek
justice and preserve its dignity, and herein charges ZaIvatore and JBellantoni as follows:
FOURTH COUNT:
The Department of Justice of the State of Mayflower, by this criminal information,
accuses JBellantoni of the crime of Unlicensed Possession of a Firearm, in violation of 1 M.S.C.
§ 6102, a felony, of the Mayflower State Criminal Code, committed as follows:
JBellantoni, in the County of Clark, on or about the 13th day of March, 2025, possessed a
firearm without holding a state issued firearms license.
FIFTH COUNT:
The Department of Justice of the State of Mayflower, by this criminal information,
accuses JBellantoni of the crime of Battery, in violation of 1 M.S.C. § 2304, a misdemeanor, of
the Mayflower State Criminal Code, committed as follows:
JBellantoni, in the County of Clark, on or about the 13th day of March, 2025, caused harm on
another person without that person’s consent, to wit, JBellantoni, punched Tedroblox2022129,
depleting their in-game health.
DATED: March 18th, 2025
huddy. 2025-03-21 05:21 p.m.
How long do we have to file our plea?
sadoimpacto 2025-03-21 05:21 p.m.
As to Count Four, Battery, how do you plead? @JohnnyBellantoni
sadoimpacto 2025-03-21 05:22 p.m.
Guilty, not guilty, no contest, or do you plead specially?
JohnnyBellantoni 2025-03-21 05:24 p.m.
Not guilty
JohnnyBellantoni 2025-03-21 05:24 p.m.@meowiitten
JohnnyBellantoniNot guilty
sadoimpacto 2025-03-21 05:26 p.m.
Apologies, Count Four was Unlicensed Possession of a Firearm. How do you plead to Count Four?
sadoimpactoApologies, Count Four was Unlicensed Possession of a Firearm. How do you plead to Count Four?
JohnnyBellantoni 2025-03-21 05:26 p.m.
Not guilty
JohnnyBellantoniNot guilty
sadoimpacto 2025-03-21 05:26 p.m.
As to Count Five, Battery, how do you plead?
sadoimpactoAs to Count Five, Battery, how do you plead?
JohnnyBellantoni 2025-03-21 05:27 p.m.
Not guilty
sadoimpacto 2025-03-22 04:50 p.m.MINUTE ENTRY: Return on Summons/Initial Appearance/Arraignment as to Counts 4 and 5 held on 3/21/2025. JBELLANTONI appeared with counsel JamesMHamilton, Esq. Plea of NOT GUILTY entered as to Counts 4 and 5.
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:05 p.m.
sadoimpacto 2025-03-22 04:50 p.m.PAPERLESS ORDER: It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court confirms the State's obligation to disclose to the defendant all exculpatory evidence—namely, evidence that favors the defendant or casts doubt on the State's case—as required by the principles established in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny. The State is hereby ORDERED to fulfill this obligation. The State has a duty to disclose any evidence that negates the defendant's guilt, affects the credibility of a witness, or could potentially reduce a sentence. The defendant is entitled to this information without needing to make a request. Failure to disclose exculpatory evidence in a timely manner may result in consequences, including, but not limited to, exclusion of evidence, dismissal of the information, contempt proceedings, disciplinary action, or sanctions by the Court. Signed by Judge sadoimpacto on 3/21/2025.
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:05 p.m.
sadoimpacto used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-23 02:47 p.m. @meowiitten has added @ز to the case channel.
Case Modified
sadoimpacto 2025-03-23 02:47 p.m.@ز Before we proceed, I must ensure you understand your rights in this matter:
1. You have the right to remain silent. This means you do not have to speak or provide any information that could incriminate you.
2. You also have the right to have an attorney present during any questioning or legal proceedings. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you at no cost.
3. You have the right to a fair and public trial, where evidence will be presented, and witnesses can be called to testify on your behalf.
4. Furthermore, you have the right to confront witnesses against you, meaning you can question them in court.
5. Finally, you have the right to appeal any conviction or sentence imposed upon you.
Funpark22 2025-03-23 10:42 p.m.@meowiitten The defense and I have concluded a plea deal for the accomplice, Jbellantoni. Follwoing state-of-mayflower-v-xxx566622zxjorjor5 , would you like a statement of facts for this plea deal as well?
Funpark22sadoimpacto 2025-03-23 11:43 p.m.
Yes
sadoimpactoYes
Funpark22 2025-03-24 02:40 a.m.
:/
Funpark22 2025-03-24 02:40 a.m.
Ok
Funpark22 2025-03-24 02:40 a.m.
Will do
Funpark22 2025-03-25 05:36 p.m.@meowiitten
Funpark22 2025-03-25 05:36 p.m.
For the accomplice
Funpark22 2025-03-25 05:36 p.m.
Courtesy copies:
Funpark22 2025-03-25 05:37 p.m.
sadoimpacto 2025-03-25 06:08 p.m.@ز Are you here?
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:05 p.m.
Funpark22Click to see attachment.
sadoimpacto 2025-03-25 06:20 p.m.
1. Are you aware that the maximum sentence for Count Four is 25 minutes?
2. Are you aware that the maximum sentence for Count Five is 17 minutes?
3. Do you understand that if sentenced to consecutive time, these penalties could add up?
4. Has anyone threatened you or forced you to plead guilty today?
5. Are you pleading guilty voluntarily and of your own free will?
6. Do you understand that by pleading guilty, you are waiving your right to a trial?
7. Do you understand that by pleading guilty, you are giving up your right to present evidence and call witnesses in your defense?
8. Do you understand that you have the right to remain silent and not incriminate yourself?
9. Do you understand that by pleading guilty, you are admitting to the facts of the charge(s) against you?
10. Have you had enough time to discuss your case with your attorney?
11. Are you satisfied with the legal representation you have received?
12. Has your attorney explained all of your rights and possible defenses to you?
13. Do you understand that if you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you?
14. Do you understand that a guilty plea could affect your record and future opportunities?
Knowing all of this, do you still wish to plead guilty? If you have any objections or queries as to the above questions, please state them now. If you would like more time to address this case with your counsel, please do so now.
If you do not have any objections and wish to proceed, please respond to this message only with:I enter this plea of guilty because I am, in fact, guilty.
@JohnnyBellantoni
2. Are you aware that the maximum sentence for Count Five is 17 minutes?
3. Do you understand that if sentenced to consecutive time, these penalties could add up?
4. Has anyone threatened you or forced you to plead guilty today?
5. Are you pleading guilty voluntarily and of your own free will?
6. Do you understand that by pleading guilty, you are waiving your right to a trial?
7. Do you understand that by pleading guilty, you are giving up your right to present evidence and call witnesses in your defense?
8. Do you understand that you have the right to remain silent and not incriminate yourself?
9. Do you understand that by pleading guilty, you are admitting to the facts of the charge(s) against you?
10. Have you had enough time to discuss your case with your attorney?
11. Are you satisfied with the legal representation you have received?
12. Has your attorney explained all of your rights and possible defenses to you?
13. Do you understand that if you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you?
14. Do you understand that a guilty plea could affect your record and future opportunities?
Knowing all of this, do you still wish to plead guilty? If you have any objections or queries as to the above questions, please state them now. If you would like more time to address this case with your counsel, please do so now.
If you do not have any objections and wish to proceed, please respond to this message only with:
sadoimpacto used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-25 08:59 p.m. @meowiitten has added @polyrabies to the case channel.
Case Modified
polyrabies 2025-03-26 02:36 a.m.
Hello everyone.
polyrabies 2025-03-26 02:36 a.m.
Allow me 48 hours to review all events within this case.
sadoimpacto 2025-03-26 09:24 a.m.
48 hours? 
sadoimpacto 2025-03-26 09:24 a.m.
You have 24
sadoimpacto1. Are you aware that the maximum sentence for Count Four is 25 minutes? 2. Are you aware that the maximum sentence for Count Five is 17 minutes? 3. Do you understand that if sente...
sadoimpacto 2025-03-26 10:17 a.m.@JohnnyBellantoni
sadoimpacto48 hours?
Funpark22 2025-03-26 03:05 p.m.
Please clarify for me that poly is defendant zai. Hamilton is defending jbell.
Funpark22 2025-03-26 03:05 p.m.
defending*
sadoimpacto 2025-03-26 03:06 p.m.
Yes
sadoimpactoYes
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:08 p.m.
also dms
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:09 p.m.
For the record, it's not in regard to this case
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:09 p.m.
I simply want to be added to another case per an noa filed
polyrabies 2025-03-26 07:37 p.m.@ز Dms.
sadoimpacto1. Are you aware that the maximum sentence for Count Four is 25 minutes? 2. Are you aware that the maximum sentence for Count Five is 17 minutes? 3. Do you understand that if sente...
sadoimpacto 2025-03-26 08:07 p.m.@JohnnyBellantoni
sadoimpactoJohnnyBellantoni 2025-03-26 08:09 p.m.
Yes indeed I agree to pleading guilty
JohnnyBellantoniYes indeed I agree to pleading guilty
sadoimpacto 2025-03-26 08:15 p.m.
Type the bolded text back(edited)
sadoimpacto 2025-03-26 08:15 p.m.
I included that instruction
JohnnyBellantoni 2025-03-26 08:31 p.m.
I enter this plea of guilty because I am, in fact, guilty.
JohnnyBellantoni 2025-03-26 08:31 p.m.@meowiitten
sadoimpacto 2025-03-26 08:42 p.m.
Alright
sadoimpacto 2025-03-26 08:42 p.m.
I’ll do the sentence later
polyrabies 2025-03-27 12:05 a.m.
Afternoon felas.
polyrabies 2025-03-27 12:05 a.m.
fellas.
polyrabies 2025-03-27 12:05 a.m.
I am all read up.
ز 2025-03-27 05:51 a.m.
Sup
JohnnyBellantoni 2025-03-29 04:39 p.m.@meowiitten u gonna process @ز too?
sadoimpacto 2025-03-29 04:56 p.m.
I will on Sunday or later today
sadoimpacto 2025-03-29 06:13 p.m.@JohnnyBellantoni Do you have anything to say before I impose a sentence?
sadoimpactoJohnnyBellantoni 2025-03-29 06:13 p.m.
No your honor I’m ready.
sadoimpacto 2025-03-29 06:13 p.m.
Ok
sadoimpacto 2025-03-29 06:14 p.m.MINUTE ENTRY: Sentencing held on 03/29/2025 before Judge sadoimpacto as to JBELLANTONI (1): Counts 4 and 5. Defendant sentenced to Thirty (30) Minutes of Incarceration.
@JohnnyBellantoni @huddy.
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:05 p.m.
sadoimpacto 2025-03-29 06:14 p.m.JBELLANTONI JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE
145.66 KB
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:05 p.m.
sadoimpacto 2025-03-29 06:16 p.m.@JohnnyBellantoni @huddy. Post-conviction motions can be filed in filing-center
sadoimpacto used /remove
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-29 06:16 p.m. @meowiitten has removed @JohnnyBellantoni from the case channel.
Case Modified
sadoimpacto used /remove
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-29 06:16 p.m. @meowiitten has removed @huddy. from the case channel.
Case Modified
sadoimpacto 2025-03-29 06:18 p.m.@ز You are charged in the information as follows:
FIRST COUNT:
The Department of Justice of the State of Mayflower, by this criminal information,
accuses Zalvatore of the crime of Kidnapping, in violation of 1 M.S.C. § 2201, a felony, of the
Mayflower State Criminal Code, committed as follows:
Zalvatore, in the County of Clark, on or about the 13th day of March, 2025, forcefully
transported Tedroblox2022129 with fear as well, over a significant distance without their
consent, to wit, Zalvatore pulled a firearm at Tedroblox2022129, ordering Tedroblox2022129 to
let the himself drive. Tedroblox2022129 went into the passenger seat and was taken to the closest
gas station, being driven by Zalvatore .
SECOND COUNT:
The Department of Justice of the State of Mayflower, by this criminal information,
accuses Zalvatore of the crime of Hijacking, in violation of 1 M.S.C. § 2309, a felony, of the
Mayflower State Criminal Code, committed as follows:
Zalvatore, in the County of Clark, on or about the 13th day of March, 2025, forcefully
stole an occupied vehicle, to wit, Zalvatore, brandishing a firearm, told the driver,
Tedroblox2022129, of a green van to let him drive the vehicle.
sadoimpactosadoimpacto 2025-03-29 06:18 p.m.
THIRD COUNT:
The Department of Justice of the State of Mayflower, by this criminal information,
accuses Zalvatore of the crime of Second-Degree Murder, in violation of 1 M.S.C. § 2102, a
felony, of the Mayflower State Criminal Code, committed as follows:
Zalvatore, in the County of Clark, on or about the 13th day of March, 2025, vicariously
aided another person in the intentional killing of Tedroblox2022129, who was killed with intent
to kill, to wit, Zalvatore drove a green van holding Tedroblox2022129, which was crashed into a
gas station. Tedroblox2022129 went to an ATM in hopes to withdraw money to give to Zalvatore
but was then shot and killed by an unnamed accomplice. An intent to kill is evident here as the
murder happened in a secluded part of Lander at a dark, dimly lit gas station, surrounded by 3
individuals, one of which being Zalvatore.
The Department of Justice of the State of Mayflower, by this criminal information,
accuses Zalvatore of the crime of Second-Degree Murder, in violation of 1 M.S.C. § 2102, a
felony, of the Mayflower State Criminal Code, committed as follows:
Zalvatore, in the County of Clark, on or about the 13th day of March, 2025, vicariously
aided another person in the intentional killing of Tedroblox2022129, who was killed with intent
to kill, to wit, Zalvatore drove a green van holding Tedroblox2022129, which was crashed into a
gas station. Tedroblox2022129 went to an ATM in hopes to withdraw money to give to Zalvatore
but was then shot and killed by an unnamed accomplice. An intent to kill is evident here as the
murder happened in a secluded part of Lander at a dark, dimly lit gas station, surrounded by 3
individuals, one of which being Zalvatore.
sadoimpacto 2025-03-29 06:19 p.m.@ز As to Count One, Kidnapping, how do you plead? Not guilty or guilty?
sadoimpacto 2025-03-29 06:19 p.m.@ز As to Count Two, Hijacking, how do you plead? Not guilty or guilty?
sadoimpacto 2025-03-29 06:19 p.m.@ز As to Count Three, Second-Degree Murder, how do you plead? Not guilty or guilty?
polyrabies 2025-03-29 07:12 p.m.
He pleas not guilty
polyrabies 2025-03-29 07:12 p.m.
to all counts
polyrabiesHe pleas not guilty
sadoimpacto 2025-03-29 08:24 p.m.
He needs to say it
sadoimpacto 2025-03-29 08:24 p.m.@ز
ز 2025-03-29 09:30 p.m.
Sorry I just got back from vacation today.
زSorry I just got back from vacation today.
sadoimpacto 2025-03-29 11:18 p.m.
Plead
ز 2025-03-30 01:22 a.m.
Not guilty on all three counts.
sadoimpacto 2025-03-31 10:41 a.m.MINUTE ENTRY: Return on Summons/Initial Appearance/Arraignment as to Counts 1, 2, and 3 held on 3/31/2025. ZAIVATORE appeared with counsel. Plea of NOT GUILTY entered as to Counts 1, 2, and 3.
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:05 p.m.
sadoimpacto 2025-03-31 10:42 a.m.PAPERLESS BRADY ORDER: It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court confirms the State's obligation to disclose to the defendant all exculpatory evidence—namely, evidence that favors the defendant or casts doubt on the State's case—as required by the principles established in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny. The State is hereby ORDERED to fulfill this obligation. The State has a duty to disclose any evidence that negates the defendant's guilt, affects the credibility of a witness, or could potentially reduce a sentence. The defendant is entitled to this information without needing to make a request. Failure to disclose exculpatory evidence in a timely manner may result in consequences, including, but not limited to, exclusion of evidence, dismissal of the information, contempt proceedings, disciplinary action, or sanctions by the Court. Signed by Judge sadoimpacto on 3/31/2025.
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:05 p.m.
sadoimpacto 2025-03-31 10:44 a.m.PAPERLESS STANDING PRETRIAL AND DISCOVERY ORDER: All parties are ordered to adhere to the following pretrial timelines. The pretrial window will close ten (10) days from March 31, 2025, concluding on April 10, 2025 at 11:59 PM EST barring extension for good cause or other unforeseen delay. By April 5, 2025 at 11:59 PM EST, all parties must disclose a final draft of their exhibit lists and witness lists. Additionally, all motions in limine must be filed no later than seventy-two (72) hours before the trial, with any oppositions due twenty-four (24) hours following the filing of such motions. Trial briefs, if any, are to be submitted no later than forty-eight (48) hours before the trial. Signed by Judge sadoimpacto on 3/31/2025.
@polyrabies @Funpark22
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:05 p.m.
sadoimpactoFunpark22 2025-03-31 11:20 a.m.
will get this in, your honor
ز 2025-04-02 11:07 p.m.
Funpark
ز 2025-04-02 11:07 p.m.
How'd you pass the bar with such IQ all due respect
ز 2025-04-02 11:07 p.m.
lol
sadoimpacto 2025-04-03 01:15 a.m.
Behave
polyrabies 2025-04-03 05:41 p.m.@meowiitten
polyrabies 2025-04-03 05:41 p.m.
when is trial
polyrabies 2025-04-03 05:41 p.m.
scheduled for
sadoimpacto 2025-04-03 05:41 p.m.
We're not even done pretrial yet
Funpark22will get this in, your honor
sadoimpacto 2025-04-03 05:41 p.m.
Where is it???
sadoimpactoWe're not even done pretrial yet
polyrabies 2025-04-03 05:41 p.m.
I know but do u have a aproximate date
sadoimpacto 2025-04-03 05:41 p.m.
No lol
sadoimpacto 2025-04-03 05:41 p.m.
Lmfao
sadoimpacto 2025-04-03 05:42 p.m.
Approximate date before pretrial ends
sadoimpacto 2025-04-03 05:42 p.m.
Yep
sadoimpactoWhere is it???
Funpark22 2025-04-03 10:03 p.m.
I have by April 5, 2025 at 11:59 PM EST
Funpark22I have by April 5, 2025 at 11:59 PM EST
sadoimpacto 2025-04-03 10:03 p.m.
No you don't
sadoimpacto 2025-04-03 10:03 p.m.
No you don't
sadoimpacto 2025-04-03 10:03 p.m.
April 5th is the close of discovery
Funpark22 2025-04-03 10:03 p.m.
" By April 5, 2025 at 11:59 PM EST, all parties must disclose a final draft of their exhibit lists and witness lists. "
sadoimpacto 2025-04-03 10:04 p.m.
I stand corrected
sadoimpacto 2025-04-03 10:04 p.m.
Apologies
sadoimpacto 2025-04-03 10:04 p.m.
I was looking at another case
sadoimpacto 2025-04-03 10:04 p.m.
Continue on
Funpark22 2025-04-03 10:04 p.m.
Nws
Funpark22Nws
polyrabies 2025-04-03 11:24 p.m.
Just for transparency of record
polyrabies 2025-04-03 11:24 p.m.
What does nws mean?
polyrabies 2025-04-03 11:25 p.m.
I know it may be slang for "no worries"
polyrabies 2025-04-03 11:25 p.m.
But the defense would like that you use proper coherent verbage.
polyrabies 2025-04-03 11:25 p.m.
So we can make informed educated decisions, based upon case content.
Funpark22 2025-04-04 08:50 a.m.
Apologies for not using proper coherent verbage
Funpark22 2025-04-04 08:50 a.m.
Yes
Funpark22 2025-04-04 08:51 a.m.
Nws in this case = no worries
Funpark22 2025-04-05 01:29 a.m.@meowiitten Hello, your honor. My office wishes to get a subpoena on the former accomplice that plea dealt off as a witness in this case. Can you inform me on the steps in doing so
Funpark22 2025-04-05 01:29 a.m.
IE 1. create motion
Funpark22 2025-04-05 01:29 a.m.
2. get it approved
Funpark22 2025-04-05 01:29 a.m.
3. clerk creates
Funpark22 2025-04-05 01:29 a.m.
Or??
Funpark22sadoimpacto 2025-04-05 01:43 a.m.
You can issue a subpoena for your own witness but @Brenda might have the right template
sadoimpacto 2025-04-05 01:44 a.m.
For the document itself
sadoimpactoYou can issue a subpoena for your own witness but @Brenda might have the right template
Funpark22 2025-04-05 03:59 p.m.
So no motions need to be made.
Funpark22 2025-04-05 03:59 p.m.
It's simply I just get the template from brenda and go after it
sadoimpacto 2025-04-05 04:31 p.m.
Yeah sure
sadoimpacto 2025-04-05 04:31 p.m.
I don't have a template
Funpark22 2025-04-05 05:02 p.m.
actually no
Funpark22 2025-04-05 05:02 p.m.
Going to put up an image
Funpark22Click to see attachment.
Funpark22 2025-04-05 05:03 p.m.
Here
Funpark22Click to see attachment.
Funpark22 2025-04-05 11:44 p.m.@meowiitten
Funpark22 2025-04-05 11:44 p.m.@polyrabies
polyrabies 2025-04-05 11:46 p.m.
The state is
polyrabies 2025-04-05 11:46 p.m.
missing
polyrabies 2025-04-05 11:46 p.m.
discovery
polyrabies 2025-04-05 11:48 p.m.
Specifically, the state has failed to hand over conversations between the Department of Justice and Witness A which took place in direct messages.
polyrabies 2025-04-05 11:50 p.m.@Funpark22
polyrabies 2025-04-05 11:50 p.m.
Can you hand over the dms between you and Witness A?
Funpark22 2025-04-05 11:50 p.m.
There were no dms
Funpark22 2025-04-05 11:50 p.m.
well
polyrabies 2025-04-05 11:50 p.m.
There were
polyrabies 2025-04-05 11:50 p.m.
Because how else did he end up
polyrabies 2025-04-05 11:50 p.m.
agreeing to a doj interview
polyrabies 2025-04-05 11:50 p.m.
or end up in a doj interview channel
polyrabies 2025-04-05 11:50 p.m. 
polyrabies 2025-04-05 11:50 p.m.
Clearly there are direct messages which werent provided in discovery
polyrabies 2025-04-05 11:51 p.m.
if the witness managed to make it in a DOJ interview channel
Funpark22 2025-04-05 11:51 p.m. 
Funpark22 2025-04-05 11:51 p.m.
Would you like these 3 classifed in the discovery?
polyrabies 2025-04-05 11:51 p.m.
Yes
Funpark22 2025-04-05 11:51 p.m.
Alr
Funpark22 2025-04-05 11:51 p.m.
gimmie rapid spped
Funpark22 2025-04-05 11:51 p.m.
speed*
polyrabies 2025-04-05 11:52 p.m.
Also
polyrabies 2025-04-05 11:52 p.m.
we are entitled to the tipline
polyrabies 2025-04-05 11:52 p.m.
submitted
polyrabies 2025-04-05 11:53 p.m.
i'm not sure why thats not in discovery
Funpark22 2025-04-05 11:53 p.m.
the tipline?
polyrabies 2025-04-05 11:53 p.m.
Yes
polyrabies 2025-04-05 11:53 p.m.
which is where the crime was reported
polyrabies 2025-04-05 11:53 p.m.
to DOJ
Funpark22 2025-04-05 11:53 p.m.
I don't have access to that
Funpark22 2025-04-05 11:53 p.m.
and we'd go over the time limit to get me that
polyrabies 2025-04-05 11:53 p.m.
Well that's brady material
polyrabies 2025-04-05 11:53 p.m.
and we are entitled to it
polyrabies 2025-04-05 11:53 p.m.
so please hand it over
Funpark22 2025-04-05 11:54 p.m.@meowiitten Can I go over the discovery limit to get this brady material requested by the defense
Funpark22sadoimpacto 2025-04-05 11:54 p.m.
Yes
Funpark22 2025-04-05 11:55 p.m.
Thanks, your honor.
Funpark22 2025-04-05 11:55 p.m.
Thankfully dero is responsive at this hour
sadoimpactoYes
Funpark22 2025-04-05 11:55 p.m.
Naming this next submission as "amended discovery"
Funpark22 2025-04-05 11:55 p.m.
For clerical purposes
Funpark22 2025-04-05 11:55 p.m.
As my Og discovery submission is on the card
polyrabies 2025-04-05 11:58 p.m. 
polyrabies 2025-04-05 11:58 p.m.
why was this not turned over?
polyrabies 2025-04-05 11:58 p.m.
please just turn it over
Funpark22 2025-04-06 12:11 a.m.
That isn't to be turned over due to the communications between myself, my paralegal, and my office.
Funpark22 2025-04-06 12:12 a.m.
Strategy communications particular to a case.
Funpark22 2025-04-06 12:12 a.m.@AdamC_2001 Can be my witness to that.
Funpark22 2025-04-06 12:12 a.m.
Also how'd you find out it was active 7 hours ago
Funpark22 2025-04-06 12:15 a.m.
In fact, how do you know that channel even exists
Funpark22 2025-04-06 12:48 a.m.@meowiitten @polyrabies
Funpark22That isn't to be turned over due to the communications between myself, my paralegal, and my office.
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:01 a.m.
Well there are communications
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:01 a.m.
which may include excuplatory evidence
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:01 a.m.
so turn those over
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:01 a.m.
Poly
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:01 a.m.
If it handed that evidence
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:01 a.m.
or redact the communications relating to strategy
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:01 a.m.
I wouldn't turned that over
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:02 a.m.
WELL YOU didnt originally turn over the literal tipline
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:02 a.m.
would've*
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:02 a.m.
and ur dms with a WITNESS
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:02 a.m.
What matters is now.
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:02 a.m.
Not a previous mistake
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:02 a.m.
YES MY CLIENT HAS THE RIGHT TO BRADY MATERIAL
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:02 a.m.
What matters is the debate on that channel
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:02 a.m.
and CLEARLY
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:02 a.m.
Stop yelling
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:02 a.m. 
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:02 a.m.
theres clearly brady material
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:02 a.m.
How'd you even find that channel?
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:02 a.m.
in that channel
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:03 a.m.
So im requesting you hand over
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:03 a.m.
the brady material
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:03 a.m.
Poly
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:03 a.m.
That channel is work product privilege
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:03 a.m.
that doesnt matter?
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:03 a.m.
it has excpulatory
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:03 a.m.
brady material in it
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:03 a.m.
you don't need to give exempt material just give the material were entitled to
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:05 a.m.
Poly, how do you know that channel exists
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:05 a.m.
That's what I'm more curious about
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:05 a.m.
Besides the point if the court wants to know I will tell them
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:05 a.m.
right now i am worried that the state is withholding
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:06 a.m.
exculpatory material
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:06 a.m.
related to my client
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:06 a.m.@meowiitten Would you allow if I not send information in that channel due to the strategies being talked about in that channel.
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:06 a.m.
I'm not asking for every single message in that chan
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:06 a.m.
just the brady material
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:06 a.m.
that the defense is entitled to
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:08 a.m.
Let me make myself clear
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:09 a.m.
there is no brady material in that channel
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:09 a.m.
All evidence has been turned over
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:09 a.m.
I don't believe you
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:09 a.m.
You think I'm withholding evidence?
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:09 a.m.
Yes because clearly that channel has an abundance of messages and its literally called "state of my v zaivatore" so clearly theres gonna be brady evidence in there
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:09 a.m.
and you've already
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:09 a.m.
withheld evidence
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:10 a.m.
and the channel was active as recently as 7 hours ago
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:10 a.m.
Poly
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:10 a.m.
If I named my store state v zaivatore
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:10 a.m.
THATS BESIDES THE POINT
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:10 a.m.
Doesn't mean it has brady evidence in there
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:10 a.m.
Poly, stop using caps
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:10 a.m.
its a channel wher eu discussed the case
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:10 a.m.
and had evidence inside of it
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:10 a.m.
In which those discussions aren't to be heard by an adverse party
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:11 a.m.
The evidence within has already been disclosed.
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:11 a.m.
They are if theres brady material.
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:11 a.m.
The previous accidentally witheld evidence was turned over.
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:11 a.m.
Alright well can you certify that there's no brady material in that channel?
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:12 a.m.@meowiitten can you make the defense certify theres no brady material in that channel, i have a good faith belief that there is
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:12 a.m.
i mean prosecution
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:13 a.m.
Myself accidentally withholding evidence that is now in my amended discovery isn't grounds to just go into our stategic channels.
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:13 a.m.
my client is facing murder charges, his freedom is at risk here
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:13 a.m.
so i dont take this lightly
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:13 a.m.
Every case across my office is practically murder charges.
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:14 a.m.
if theres excpulatory material in possession of DOJ
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:14 a.m.
relating to my client
polyrabies 2025-04-06 01:14 a.m.
which hasnt been turned over, thats an EXTREME ISSUE
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:17 a.m.
This also sets a poor precedent that our strategy channels would have to be turned over.
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:17 a.m.
All cases that I get have a channel
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:17 a.m.
All SAs in the CJO have their cases organized in channels
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:18 a.m.
All of which that have brady material are turned over via their links
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:18 a.m.
For example talking about the creation of the discovery file in regard putting exhibit A on there.
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:18 a.m.
That exhibit A which is on the aopc and talked about are on that discovery file.
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:19 a.m.
Sure, there's brady evidence within that channel but it's been handed over.
Funpark22The evidence within has already been disclosed.
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:19 a.m.
a
Funpark22All evidence has been turned over
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:19 a.m.
a
Funpark22there is no brady material in that channel
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:19 a.m.
Strike that. Talk about exhibit A and B are within that channel.
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:21 a.m.
Let me make myself very clear. The evidence within that channel, has been turned over.
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:22 a.m.
channel has*
Funpark22 2025-04-06 01:22 a.m.
If brady evidence was in there, it would be turned over.
Funpark22This also sets a poor precedent that our strategy channels would have to be turned over.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-06 01:41 a.m.
This is not the case
sadoimpacto 2025-04-06 01:42 a.m.
Also I might add
sadoimpacto 2025-04-06 01:42 a.m.
If there’s confusion over whether something is Brady material it should be reviewed by me
sadoimpacto 2025-04-06 01:42 a.m.
As to prevent a fishing expedition
sadoimpacto 2025-04-06 11:04 p.m.@Funpark22 @polyrabies What day can you both give opening statements? It will be on Discord. Has to be within 3 days from today.
sadoimpactopolyrabies 2025-04-06 11:16 p.m.
15th of april
polyrabies 2025-04-06 11:16 p.m.
because pre trial hasn't ended yet
sadoimpactoFunpark22 2025-04-06 11:25 p.m.
If we can do it continuous
Funpark22 2025-04-06 11:25 p.m.
That would be great.
polyrabiesbecause pre trial hasn't ended yet
sadoimpacto 2025-04-06 11:26 p.m.
I mean, do you really want to keep doing pretrial...? Neither of you are doing anything. Just waiting on @Funpark22 's discovery
Funpark22Funpark22 2025-04-06 11:27 p.m.
hi
Funpark22 2025-04-06 11:27 p.m.
It just doesn't have the work product privilege stuff that is in the channel previously discussed
sadoimpacto 2025-04-06 11:28 p.m.
Alright
sadoimpacto 2025-04-06 11:28 p.m.@polyrabies @Funpark22 Are you planning any pretrial motions?
Funpark22 2025-04-06 11:29 p.m.
Unless that would be a reply to a MTD
Funpark22 2025-04-06 11:29 p.m.
no
Funpark22 2025-04-06 11:29 p.m.
sadoimpactopolyrabies 2025-04-06 11:32 p.m.
Possibly.
polyrabiesPossibly.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-06 11:32 p.m.
Okay, it's a yes or a no
sadoimpacto 2025-04-06 11:33 p.m.
This isn't like a "maybe" question
polyrabies 2025-04-06 11:33 p.m.
I'm not sure, because the time you gave us which was 10 days for pre trial motions
polyrabies 2025-04-06 11:33 p.m.
is also time to make educated decisions
polyrabies 2025-04-06 11:33 p.m.
in terms of making motions
polyrabies 2025-04-06 11:33 p.m.
so i want to use that time
sadoimpacto 2025-04-06 11:33 p.m.
Okay but for that matter you wasted 6-7 days already
polyrabies 2025-04-06 11:33 p.m.
I just got added here
polyrabies 2025-04-06 11:33 p.m.
like 2 days ago.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-06 11:34 p.m.
Yeah that's not true
polyrabies 2025-04-06 11:34 p.m.
Let me see.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-06 11:34 p.m.
You were added 10 days ago
sadoimpacto 2025-04-06 11:34 p.m.
2 days
sadoimpacto 2025-04-06 11:34 p.m.
2 days Bro
sadoimpacto 2025-04-06 11:34 p.m.
2 Daysssssssssssssssssss
sadoimpacto 2025-04-06 11:34 p.m.
Alright
sadoimpacto 2025-04-06 11:35 p.m.
Alright pretrial is over
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:05 p.m.
sadoimpactosadoimpacto 2025-04-06 11:36 p.m.
This order is vacated
sadoimpacto 2025-04-06 11:36 p.m.PAPERLESS SCHEDULING ORDER: The above-captioned matter is set for trial asynchronously on 4/7/2025 at 6:00 PM Eastern Time. Signed by Judge sadoimpacto on 4/6/2025.
@Funpark22 @polyrabies
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:05 p.m.
Funpark22 2025-04-06 11:37 p.m.
I might be having dinner then
Funpark22 2025-04-06 11:37 p.m.
So I might be late
polyrabies 2025-04-06 11:37 p.m.
thats 9 am for me
polyrabies 2025-04-06 11:37 p.m.
so i wont be able to be there
sadoimpacto 2025-04-06 11:37 p.m.
It's continuous
polyrabies 2025-04-06 11:38 p.m.
Can we do trial right now?
sadoimpacto 2025-04-06 11:38 p.m.
I suppose if you really want to
polyrabies 2025-04-06 11:38 p.m.
I do
sadoimpacto 2025-04-06 11:38 p.m.@Funpark22 Can you give opening statements right now
Funpark22 2025-04-06 11:39 p.m.
This case is being strictly supervised by my AAG so I'll get it out when I can.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-06 11:39 p.m.
Alright then we'll just keep it set for tomorrow
sadoimpacto 2025-04-06 11:39 p.m.
And you can respond within 24 hours of that 5:00 PM
sadoimpacto 2025-04-06 11:39 p.m.
EST
Funpark22 2025-04-06 11:39 p.m.
sure
sadoimpacto 2025-04-06 11:39 p.m.
The next message sent in this channel should be @Funpark22 's opening statements and nothing else unless it's urgent
sadoimpacto 2025-04-06 11:39 p.m.
Funpark22 2025-04-07 04:37 p.m.
Your honor, this isn't your average case. The Defendant did a flurry of actions that were planned in hopes to achieve monetary gain. Actions that would strip Tedroblox2022129 of their money. This Victim has suffered getting killed due to the actions that the Defendant did. It started as Tedroblox2022129 was minding his own business when the Defendant ordered at gun point for Tedroblox2022129 to withdraw money at an ATM to give it to the Defendant.
Now, your honor, Tedroblox2022129 made continuous wrong turns towards the ATM which enraged the Defendant resulting in a shot to come off within the van. The Defendant ordered the Victim out of the car and drove. Keep in mind, the Victim went into the passenger seat due to still being held at gun point with the fear of being killed.
The Defendant drove himself and the Victim to the nearest gas station in which the Victim is killed by an unknown person.
Previous, as Tedroblox2022129 is driving the Defendant around an impoverished part of Lander, we see a vehicle that we see again behind the van when the Defendant is driving towards the gas station. All of these events are strung together perfectly to result in getting money from Tedroblox2022129. But, that didn't go to plan. It ended up in the tragic and truly saddening death of Tedroblox2022129.
Your honor, you'll hear from Tedroblox2022129 who will give his layperson point of view on the situation and will give his insight to what happened. He'll give insight on the context of the situation especially how the Defendant and Victim got to be driving towards an ATM.
The state comes after Zalvatore to achieve justice for Tedroblox2022129. The State asks for the Defendant to be found guilty of kidnapping, hijacking, and Second-Degree Murder (vicariously). The State seeks criminalization as their relief.
Now, your honor, Tedroblox2022129 made continuous wrong turns towards the ATM which enraged the Defendant resulting in a shot to come off within the van. The Defendant ordered the Victim out of the car and drove. Keep in mind, the Victim went into the passenger seat due to still being held at gun point with the fear of being killed.
The Defendant drove himself and the Victim to the nearest gas station in which the Victim is killed by an unknown person.
Previous, as Tedroblox2022129 is driving the Defendant around an impoverished part of Lander, we see a vehicle that we see again behind the van when the Defendant is driving towards the gas station. All of these events are strung together perfectly to result in getting money from Tedroblox2022129. But, that didn't go to plan. It ended up in the tragic and truly saddening death of Tedroblox2022129.
Your honor, you'll hear from Tedroblox2022129 who will give his layperson point of view on the situation and will give his insight to what happened. He'll give insight on the context of the situation especially how the Defendant and Victim got to be driving towards an ATM.
The state comes after Zalvatore to achieve justice for Tedroblox2022129. The State asks for the Defendant to be found guilty of kidnapping, hijacking, and Second-Degree Murder (vicariously). The State seeks criminalization as their relief.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-07 09:58 p.m.@polyrabies Your opening statement?
polyrabies 2025-04-07 10:00 p.m.
Do I have to send them now
polyrabies 2025-04-07 10:00 p.m.
Still writing them
polyrabies 2025-04-08 01:50 a.m.
Your honor, the State has failed to meet the burden of proof to convict my Client and have presented a case which lacks merit.
On Count 1 Kidnapping, which is defined as "Any person who uses force or fear to transport a person across a significant distance without their consent, shall be guilty of a felony.". Exhibit A fails to provide a full timeline of events and lacks critical context to be able to ascertain what truly happened within this purported "kidnapping", specifically the beginning of the video shows my Client and the "Victim" already in the van, it doesn't show the Victim being forced into the van or any use of fear or force to get the individual in the van and to transport the victim and my Client to transfer money as alleged by the state. You cannot possibly conclude that my Client utilised force or fear to get the individual in the van when the beginning of the video shows them already in the van. Infact this was everything short of a kidnapping, my Client is giving calm and collected instructions to the "Victim" to get him to a place, he doesn't utilise capitalisation to express fear or urgency of matter like a regular kidnapper would. For 90% of the "kidnapping incident" my Client has no firearm drawn or any weapon drawn, infact he only draws his firearm once due to a misclick which typically happens as Clark is a game, and we all tend to accidentally pull out our guns when we shouldn't. So tell me, how is this a kidnapping if my Client never used threats or force to compel the individual to drive. There may be once instance where my client accidentally discharged a firearm which only accounted for 2 seconds of the full alegged kidnapping which spans over 1 minute and 40 seconds. Infact my client has no ski mask on or any surgical gloves which criminal typically use to conceal crimes, and a crime of this caliber would prompt the use of concealment instructments which aren't present here.
On Count 1 Kidnapping, which is defined as "Any person who uses force or fear to transport a person across a significant distance without their consent, shall be guilty of a felony.". Exhibit A fails to provide a full timeline of events and lacks critical context to be able to ascertain what truly happened within this purported "kidnapping", specifically the beginning of the video shows my Client and the "Victim" already in the van, it doesn't show the Victim being forced into the van or any use of fear or force to get the individual in the van and to transport the victim and my Client to transfer money as alleged by the state. You cannot possibly conclude that my Client utilised force or fear to get the individual in the van when the beginning of the video shows them already in the van. Infact this was everything short of a kidnapping, my Client is giving calm and collected instructions to the "Victim" to get him to a place, he doesn't utilise capitalisation to express fear or urgency of matter like a regular kidnapper would. For 90% of the "kidnapping incident" my Client has no firearm drawn or any weapon drawn, infact he only draws his firearm once due to a misclick which typically happens as Clark is a game, and we all tend to accidentally pull out our guns when we shouldn't. So tell me, how is this a kidnapping if my Client never used threats or force to compel the individual to drive. There may be once instance where my client accidentally discharged a firearm which only accounted for 2 seconds of the full alegged kidnapping which spans over 1 minute and 40 seconds. Infact my client has no ski mask on or any surgical gloves which criminal typically use to conceal crimes, and a crime of this caliber would prompt the use of concealment instructments which aren't present here.
polyrabies 2025-04-08 01:54 a.m.
On count 2 of Hijacking, Hijacking is defined as "Any person who forcefully steals an occupied vehicle shall be guilty of a felony..". At no point of time did my Client forcefully "steal" any vehicle, the Victim volunteerly allowed my Client to drive the vehicle, my Client even provided notice and made a request to drive his vehicle "let me drive", he said that extremely calmly while not having any firearm out or any weapon or making any threats, no utilisation of capitalisation to express urgency and inflict fear or intimidation, infact the state code clearly states the vehicle must be occupied, the vehicle was not occupied at the moment my Client got into the driver seat as the Victim got out for him to drive it. It's quite clear there's no hijacking, the victim isn't even in fear hes having a simple relaxed nonchalant conversation with my Client. No vehicle was hijacked, the vehicle was driven with consent of the owner.
polyrabies 2025-04-08 01:55 a.m.
There was no utilisation of force either, so quite simply my Client hasn't committed hijacking.
polyrabies 2025-04-08 01:57 a.m.
On count 3 of Second Degree Murder, "Any person who intentionally kills another person with intent to kill or commit great bodily harm shall be guilty of a felony.". As Exhibit A clearly shows, at no point of time did my Client ever kill anyone or discharge a firearm at anyone, you cannot be guilty just because you're standing in a public area during the death of an individual.
polyrabies 2025-04-08 01:57 a.m.
That's all.
polyrabies 2025-04-08 02:00 a.m.
I'd also like to add the STATE must PROVE BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT THAT MY CLIENT IS GUILTY OF ALL ALLEGGED CRIMES. THATS ALL.
polyrabies 2025-04-08 02:01 a.m.
It is not enough for the prosecution to suggest guiltI t is their duty to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that my client committed this crime. And unless they can do so without any ambiguity or uncertainty, then the law demands a verdict of not guilty.
polyrabies 2025-04-08 02:02 a.m.
tHAT'S ALL.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-08 09:58 a.m.@Funpark22 Your first witness?
sadoimpactoFunpark22 2025-04-08 11:35 p.m.
My first and only witness will be @Ted
Funpark22 2025-04-08 11:35 p.m.
Thank god he's actually in this server 
sadoimpacto used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-08 11:40 p.m. @meowiitten has added @Ted to the case channel.
Case Modified
sadoimpacto 2025-04-08 11:40 p.m.@Ted Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God?
sadoimpacto
Ted 2025-04-09 03:26 a.m.
Yes, Your honor.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-09 09:16 a.m.@Funpark22 Your witness
Funpark22 2025-04-09 05:05 p.m.@Ted How are you today, Sir?
Funpark22Ted 2025-04-09 05:11 p.m.
I am good, thank you for asking.
TedI am good, thank you for asking.
Funpark22 2025-04-09 05:13 p.m.
Alright. Lets get down to business. Do you recognize exhibit A in the Plaintiff's discovery? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yl5KQhSh3J4
Ted 2025-04-09 05:13 p.m.
Yes.
TedYes.
Funpark22 2025-04-09 05:14 p.m.
Do you see yourself within this exhibit?
Ted 2025-04-09 05:14 p.m.
Yes.
TedYes.
Funpark22 2025-04-09 05:14 p.m.
Can you briefly describe your avatar for the purpose of the record?
Ted 2025-04-09 05:15 p.m.
Wearing a suit with glasses and a line type of headphone.
Funpark22 2025-04-09 05:16 p.m.
Your honor, @meowiitten , I ask for this court to admit exhibit A in the Plaintiff's exhibit as Exhibit A for this trial.
Funpark22 2025-04-09 05:16 p.m.
Plaintiff's discovery*
polyrabies 2025-04-09 05:17 p.m.
I object to the state referring to themselves as the “plaintiff”
Funpark22Alright. Lets get down to business. Do you recognize exhibit A in the Plaintiff's discovery? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yl5KQhSh3J4
polyrabies 2025-04-09 05:43 p.m.
I also object to any unneeded statements which can impact the witnesses testimony "Alright. Lets get down to business"
polyrabiesI object to the state referring to themselves as the “plaintiff”
Funpark22 2025-04-09 05:44 p.m.
That's the literal name of the entry on the card
Funpark22Your honor, @meowiitten , I ask for this court to admit exhibit A in the Plaintiff's exhibit as Exhibit A for this trial.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-09 05:44 p.m.
Admitted
sadoimpacto 2025-04-09 05:44 p.m.
State is preferrable but Plaintiff is fine
sadoimpacto 2025-04-09 05:45 p.m.
Continue
polyrabiesI also object to any unneeded statements which can impact the witnesses testimony "Alright. Lets get down to business"
Funpark22 2025-04-09 05:45 p.m.
I'm not ordered for business. I'm simply being calm.
polyrabies 2025-04-09 05:45 p.m.
and im also requesting a private thread is created
sadoimpactoContinue
Funpark22 2025-04-09 05:45 p.m.
Will do.
polyrabies 2025-04-09 05:45 p.m.
for motions
polyrabies 2025-04-09 05:45 p.m.
to avoid the witness seeing whats being said
sadoimpacto 2025-04-09 05:45 p.m.
Stop talking @polyrabies
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:05 p.m.
Funpark22I'm not ordered for business. I'm simply being calm.
Funpark22 2025-04-09 05:45 p.m.
ordering*
polyrabies 2025-04-09 05:45 p.m.
your honor this is urgent, if the witness can see whats being said that can impact their testimony
polyrabies 2025-04-09 05:45 p.m.
specifically motions
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:05 p.m.
Funpark22Alright. Lets get down to business. Do you recognize exhibit A in the Plaintiff's discovery? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yl5KQhSh3J4
Funpark22 2025-04-09 05:46 p.m.
As of 0:00 seconds, what are you actively doing?
Funpark22 2025-04-09 05:46 p.m.@Ted
Funpark22As of 0:00 seconds, what are you actively doing?
polyrabies 2025-04-09 05:46 p.m.
objection vague
polyrabiesobjection vague
Funpark22 2025-04-09 05:47 p.m.
It's a generalized statement of asking what the witness is doing as of 0:00 seconds. I'm not asking what he did over the course of the video. I'm being specific for at 0:00 seconds.
Funpark22As of 0:00 seconds, what are you actively doing?
Ted 2025-04-09 05:47 p.m.
I was heading to Medford to buy a axe for logging.
Funpark22It's a generalized statement of asking what the witness is doing as of 0:00 seconds. I'm not asking what he did over the course of the video. I'm being specific for at 0:00 seconds...
polyrabies 2025-04-09 05:47 p.m.
you can't ask a generalised statement
polyrabies 2025-04-09 05:47 p.m.
your honor i object to his question its vague
polyrabiesobjection vague
sadoimpacto 2025-04-09 07:08 p.m.
Overruled
TedI was heading to Medford to buy a axe for logging.
Funpark22 2025-04-09 09:26 p.m.
I'm asking at the 0:00 seconds, what were you doing in Lander. NOT what you were possibly doing before.
Ted 2025-04-09 09:27 p.m.
I was travelling to Medford alpine logging area by the highway before I got stopped.
Funpark22I'm asking at the 0:00 seconds, what were you doing in Lander. NOT what you were possibly doing before.
polyrabies 2025-04-09 10:53 p.m.
objection leading, the witness alraedy answered the question
polyrabies 2025-04-09 10:53 p.m.
i also object as he already asked the question and it was answered
polyrabies 2025-04-09 10:54 p.m.
im also requesting the witnesses response is struck from the record
polyrabies 2025-04-09 10:54 p.m.
i'm also objecting as the state is attempting to bolster the witness and lead them to a answer rather then the one they've already provided to the same exact question asked before..
polyrabiesobjection leading, the witness alraedy answered the question
sadoimpacto 2025-04-09 10:55 p.m.
Sustained as to asked and answered
sadoimpactoSustained as to asked and answered
polyrabies 2025-04-09 10:56 p.m.
witnesses response is struck from the record too?
sadoimpacto 2025-04-09 10:56 p.m.
That's basically what that means
polyrabies 2025-04-09 10:56 p.m.
Okay just making sure
Funpark22 2025-04-09 11:08 p.m.
Your honor, I move to mark my witness hostile. The witness clearly doesn't understand that I'm talking about what he's doing at 0:00 not before hw we stopped (what wasn't established yet). If you look in exhibit A, he's driving in Lander, not going to medford...
Funpark22 2025-04-09 11:10 p.m.
not before he was*
Funpark22 2025-04-09 11:11 p.m.@meowiitten
Funpark22Your honor, I move to mark my witness hostile. The witness clearly doesn't understand that I'm talking about what he's doing at 0:00 not before hw we stopped (what wasn't establish...
sadoimpacto 2025-04-09 11:12 p.m.
You're only a couple questions in. Denied
TedI was heading to Medford to buy a axe for logging.
Funpark22 2025-04-09 11:14 p.m.
After buying that axe, you drove to lander, correct?
Funpark22 2025-04-09 11:14 p.m.
-
Funpark22After buying that axe, you drove to lander, correct?
Ted 2025-04-09 11:14 p.m.
Yes.
Funpark22 2025-04-09 11:15 p.m.
In the case this question is objected for as leading^^^ --- This is foundational. Last time I checked foundational questions during direct can be leading.
TedYes.
Funpark22 2025-04-09 11:17 p.m.
But, didn't you get stopped before going to medford?
Funpark22But, didn't you get stopped before going to medford?
Ted 2025-04-09 11:19 p.m.
Yes.
Funpark22 2025-04-09 11:19 p.m.
Ok, you got stopped before going to medford. Now, can you tell the judge who did you get stooped by?
Funpark22 2025-04-09 11:19 p.m.
you got stopped by*
Ted 2025-04-09 11:20 p.m.
I got stopped by JBellantoni, zaivatore and a unknow person.
Funpark22 2025-04-09 11:21 p.m.
When you were stopped, can you explain what happened
Ted 2025-04-09 11:22 p.m.
They stopped their vehicles at front of me. Then hop out of their vehicle pull out their weapon on me and tell me to give them my money.
TedThey stopped their vehicles at front of me. Then hop out of their vehicle pull out their weapon on me and tell me to give them my money.
Funpark22 2025-04-09 11:25 p.m.
When you were in front of those weapons, how did you feel?
Ted 2025-04-09 11:26 p.m.
I feel threatened and my life is in immediate danger that might even cost me to death.
Funpark22 2025-04-09 11:26 p.m.
What was the plan for you to get them money?
Funpark22 2025-04-09 11:26 p.m.
or your money
Ted 2025-04-09 11:27 p.m.
Go to a nearby ATM because I do not have money on me and I don't want to die.
TedGo to a nearby ATM because I do not have money on me and I don't want to die.
Funpark22 2025-04-09 11:28 p.m.
And to get to the nearby ATM, what was the plan?
Ted 2025-04-09 11:29 p.m.
They told me to follow their vehicle with one of their member which is zaivatore to sit in my vehicle incase of I running away.
Funpark22 2025-04-09 11:29 p.m.
Did zaivatore give instructions on how to get to the ATM?
Ted 2025-04-09 11:32 p.m.
He didn't but during the middle of I driving to the ATM, He told me to hop off and get in the passenger and let him drive.
TedHe didn't but during the middle of I driving to the ATM, He told me to hop off and get in the passenger and let him drive.
Funpark22 2025-04-09 11:33 p.m.
Just previous to him telling you to hop off, did you make a series of wrong turns?
Funpark22Just previous to him telling you to hop off, did you make a series of wrong turns?
Ted 2025-04-09 11:33 p.m.
Yes.
TedYes.
Funpark22 2025-04-09 11:34 p.m.
Why did he tell you to hop out of the driver vehicle?
Funpark22 2025-04-09 11:34 p.m.
driver seat in the vehicle*
Funpark22Why did he tell you to hop out of the driver vehicle?
Ted 2025-04-09 11:35 p.m.
Because I was driving too slow and driving on the wrong direction.
Funpark22 2025-04-09 11:36 p.m.
Now, what made you suddenly stop your vehicle at about 0:35-6 seconds?
Funpark22Now, what made you suddenly stop your vehicle at about 0:35-6 seconds?
Ted 2025-04-09 11:37 p.m.
Because he had shot his weapon.
Funpark22 2025-04-09 11:37 p.m.
Did you ever pose a deadly threat to him?
TedBecause he had shot his weapon.
Ted 2025-04-09 11:37 p.m.
Also because I don't want to type while driving.
Funpark22Did you ever pose a deadly threat to him?
Ted 2025-04-09 11:38 p.m.
No, I do not have any weapon at the time.
Funpark22Alright. Lets get down to business. Do you recognize exhibit A in the Plaintiff's discovery? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yl5KQhSh3J4
Funpark22 2025-04-09 11:39 p.m.
At 00:52, can you explain to this court and your honor what the defendant did?
Funpark22At 00:52, can you explain to this court and your honor what the defendant did?
Ted 2025-04-09 11:40 p.m.
He had pointed his weapon at me and say "let me drive"
TedHe had pointed his weapon at me and say "let me drive"
Funpark22 2025-04-09 11:46 p.m.
How did you feel?
Ted 2025-04-09 11:46 p.m.
Threaten.
TedThreaten.
Funpark22 2025-04-09 11:47 p.m.
What did you do as a result of being threatened?
Ted 2025-04-09 11:48 p.m.
I hop out of my vehicle and let him drive my vehicle.
TedI hop out of my vehicle and let him drive my vehicle.
Funpark22 2025-04-09 11:49 p.m.
For the purpose of the record, what's your vehicle?
Ted 2025-04-09 11:49 p.m.
A green van.
Ted 2025-04-09 11:49 p.m.
Cargo type.
Funpark22 2025-04-09 11:50 p.m.
Did he get in your vehicle?
Ted 2025-04-09 11:51 p.m.
Yes.
TedYes.
Funpark22 2025-04-09 11:52 p.m.
When he got into the driver seat of your vehicle, what did you do?
Ted 2025-04-09 11:53 p.m.
I hop into the passenger seat of my vehicle.
Funpark22 2025-04-09 11:53 p.m.
Why?
Ted 2025-04-09 11:55 p.m.
Because if I ran he,will possibly kill me.
Funpark22 2025-04-09 11:55 p.m.
I see
Funpark22 2025-04-09 11:55 p.m.
After you got into the vehicle, where were you transported?
Ted 2025-04-09 11:57 p.m.
A gas station that is near Autozone car dealership.
polyrabies 2025-04-09 11:57 p.m.
Your honor can we
polyrabies 2025-04-09 11:57 p.m.
pause testimony for a sec and speak outside of the presenec of the witness.
Funpark22 2025-04-09 11:58 p.m.
I'm inthe middle of direct examination.
Funpark22 2025-04-09 11:58 p.m.
in the*
polyrabies 2025-04-09 11:58 p.m.
Well pause it
polyrabies 2025-04-09 11:58 p.m.
cause its important
polyrabiespause testimony for a sec and speak outside of the presenec of the witness.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 12:26 a.m.
What for?
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 12:26 a.m.
You'll note in my rules that I generally disfavor sidebars
polyrabies 2025-04-10 12:26 a.m.
Well i beleive its important
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 12:27 a.m.
Okay...? What's it about
polyrabies 2025-04-10 12:30 a.m.
prejudicial conduct
polyrabies 2025-04-10 12:30 a.m.
due to the state
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 12:31 a.m.@polyrabies Of what nature?
polyrabies 2025-04-10 12:31 a.m.
you see i don't want to say it which is why i said outside of the witnesses presence, but dw about it if its just gonna waste time
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 12:31 a.m.
Listen
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 12:32 a.m.
If I see something that's insanely prejudicial, I'll stop the testimony. But if this is like a "I object to this" or "this answer should be stricken," then don't bother
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 12:32 a.m.
You can state objections
polyrabies 2025-04-10 12:32 a.m.
It's not
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 12:35 a.m.
What is it
polyrabies 2025-04-10 12:35 a.m.
Just don't worry about it, cause if i say it here its just gonna cause even more prejudice
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 12:35 a.m.
You can DM it to me then and I'll tell the prosecutor if it's that serious
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 12:35 a.m.
This better be good
polyrabies 2025-04-10 12:36 a.m.
I'll just make it a MTD.
polyrabies 2025-04-10 12:36 a.m.
well
polyrabies 2025-04-10 12:36 a.m.
i can't anyway but whatever
polyrabies 2025-04-10 12:37 a.m.
Maybe motion for mistrial
sadoimpactoYou can DM it to me then and I'll tell the prosecutor if it's that serious
Funpark22 2025-04-10 12:37 a.m.
I'd rather be aware for all messages sent to you
Funpark22 2025-04-10 12:37 a.m.
I dislike 1 sided communication to the judge.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 12:38 a.m.
Join the thread
ز 2025-04-10 05:49 p.m.
Hm
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 06:17 p.m.@Funpark22 You can continue questioning
Ted 2025-04-10 06:38 p.m.
Your honor, I don't know is it that allowed but is the defendant's attorney allow to text me?
Ted 2025-04-10 06:39 p.m.
In direct message.
TedYour honor, I don't know is it that allowed but is the defendant's attorney allow to text me?
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 06:50 p.m.
What's he sending you?
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 06:50 p.m.
Can you screenshot it and send it here
sadoimpactoWhat's he sending you?
Ted 2025-04-10 06:51 p.m.
Here, Your honor.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 06:51 p.m.@polyrabies You are not allowed to privately message a witness who is currently on the stand
TedHere, Your honor.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 06:53 p.m.
Are you Chinese? How are you able to use Discord lol
sadoimpactoAre you Chinese? How are you able to use Discord lol
Ted 2025-04-10 06:54 p.m.
I am born in Hong Kong lived there for 12 years but now live in Canada.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 06:54 p.m.
Oh ok
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 06:54 p.m.
Makes sense
sadoimpactopolyrabies 2025-04-10 07:13 p.m.
Sorry, it was due to what i told you in sidebar.
sadoimpactoFunpark22 2025-04-10 10:04 p.m.
Will do
Funpark22 2025-04-10 10:04 p.m.
Lemme clear pings
Funpark22 2025-04-10 10:04 p.m.
and get back to this
TedA gas station that is near Autozone car dealership.
Funpark22 2025-04-10 10:22 p.m.
Why the gas station?
Funpark22Why the gas station?
Ted 2025-04-10 10:22 p.m.
Because as I know is one of the nearest place that have a ATM.
TedBecause as I know is one of the nearest place that have a ATM.
Funpark22 2025-04-10 10:23 p.m.
And who drove you to the gas station?
Funpark22And who drove you to the gas station?
Ted 2025-04-10 10:24 p.m.
zaivatore
Tedzaivatore
Funpark22 2025-04-10 10:25 p.m.
And when you got to the gas station, what was the vehicle behind the green van?
Funpark22 2025-04-10 10:26 p.m.
At 1:32
Ted 2025-04-10 10:26 p.m.
It was a black sedan.
Funpark22Alright. Lets get down to business. Do you recognize exhibit A in the Plaintiff's discovery? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yl5KQhSh3J4
Funpark22 2025-04-10 10:26 p.m.
a
Funpark22 2025-04-10 10:26 p.m.
Now, when you got to the gas station, what did you do?
Ted 2025-04-10 10:27 p.m.
I went to the ATM that was in the gas station.
Funpark22 2025-04-10 10:27 p.m.
Was anyone following you?
Ted 2025-04-10 10:27 p.m.
I believe not.
Funpark22 2025-04-10 10:28 p.m.
Well at a 1:36 -- End of video, aren't there individuals there with you at the ATM?
Ted 2025-04-10 10:29 p.m.
Yes.
Ted 2025-04-10 10:29 p.m.
But they were arrived at the same time at the gas station not following.
Funpark22 2025-04-10 10:32 p.m.
Alright, and at the ATM, describe what happened.
Funpark22Well at a 1:36 -- End of video, aren't there individuals there with you at the ATM?
polyrabies 2025-04-10 10:33 p.m.
objection leading
Funpark22 2025-04-10 10:33 p.m.
It's foundational
polyrabies 2025-04-10 10:33 p.m.
we're half way into the testimony
polyrabies 2025-04-10 10:34 p.m.
how are u still asking foundational questions
Funpark22 2025-04-10 10:34 p.m.
I'm asking a question that is foundational to an additional question
polyrabies 2025-04-10 10:34 p.m.
i still object
polyrabiesobjection leading
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 10:35 p.m.
Sustained
Funpark22 2025-04-10 10:35 p.m.
Fair, no need to rephrase
Funpark22Alright, and at the ATM, describe what happened.
Funpark22 2025-04-10 10:36 p.m.@Ted
Funpark22Alright, and at the ATM, describe what happened.
polyrabies 2025-04-10 10:37 p.m.
objection, vague
polyrabies 2025-04-10 10:37 p.m.
doesn't reference a timestamp
polyrabies 2025-04-10 10:37 p.m.
or anything
polyrabies 2025-04-10 10:37 p.m.
just says "at the atm"
Funpark22 2025-04-10 10:37 p.m.
We've established we're at the atm
Funpark22 2025-04-10 10:38 p.m.
At 1:36--end of video
Funpark22At 1:36--end of video
Funpark22 2025-04-10 10:38 p.m.
that question was struck*
polyrabies 2025-04-10 10:38 p.m.
And i still am objecting as "aTM" is vague
TedI went to the ATM that was in the gas station.
Funpark22 2025-04-10 10:38 p.m.
We're at the atm
polyrabies 2025-04-10 10:38 p.m.
not plain language
Funpark22 2025-04-10 10:38 p.m.
At the gas station
Funpark22 2025-04-10 10:38 p.m.@meowiitten Is it expected that we have ATM fully spelled out?
polyrabies 2025-04-10 10:38 p.m.
That's not my only concern
Funpark22 2025-04-10 10:38 p.m.
Or is the court able to understand that we're at the ATM
polyrabies 2025-04-10 10:38 p.m.
its still vague
polyrabies 2025-04-10 10:38 p.m.
ur asking a question
polyrabies 2025-04-10 10:39 p.m.
about a "atm" no timestamp no nothing
Funpark22sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 10:39 p.m.
No
polyrabies 2025-04-10 10:39 p.m.
just a random atm
Funpark22 2025-04-10 10:39 p.m.
I believe the witness is able to know what is being talked about
Funpark22 2025-04-10 10:39 p.m.
We're at the ATM
Funpark22 2025-04-10 10:39 p.m.
At the gas station
polyrabiesobjection, vague
Funpark22 2025-04-10 10:42 p.m.@meowiitten
polyrabiesobjection, vague
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 10:43 p.m.
Overruled
Funpark22Alright, and at the ATM, describe what happened.
Funpark22 2025-04-10 10:44 p.m.
again @Ted
Ted 2025-04-10 10:44 p.m.
I took money out from the ATM but after I took it they killed me.
polyrabies 2025-04-10 10:45 p.m.
Objection speculation
polyrabies 2025-04-10 10:45 p.m.
how can he know he was killed
Funpark22 2025-04-10 10:45 p.m.
The giant screen that shows "YOU DIED"
polyrabies 2025-04-10 10:46 p.m.
Yeah, but if he was dead he wouldn't remember it
polyrabies 2025-04-10 10:46 p.m.
would he
Funpark22 2025-04-10 10:46 p.m.
This is roblox
Funpark22 2025-04-10 10:46 p.m.
We respawn
polyrabies 2025-04-10 10:46 p.m.
Clark is a roleplay game.
Funpark22 2025-04-10 10:46 p.m.
We remember our past lives
polyrabies 2025-04-10 10:46 p.m.
We must have some roleplay in this court.
Funpark22 2025-04-10 10:46 p.m.
If this is sustained, this eliminates victim testimony of murder related crimes across the board.
Funpark22 2025-04-10 10:46 p.m.
In fact,
polyrabies 2025-04-10 10:47 p.m.
If this is sustained, it will make the court more realistic.
Funpark22 2025-04-10 10:47 p.m.
how are we able to call the witness up right now
Funpark22 2025-04-10 10:47 p.m.
Also, roblox characters are aware of when they die as well by being aware of the health bar in the bottom left hand side of one's screen.
polyrabiesObjection speculation
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 10:54 p.m.
Objection
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 10:54 p.m.
...?
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 10:54 p.m.
Really
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 10:54 p.m.
Overruled
TedI took money out from the ATM but after I took it they killed me.
Funpark22 2025-04-10 10:55 p.m.
Who's they?
Ted 2025-04-10 10:58 p.m.
The two defendant and a unknown person.
TedThe two defendant and a unknown person.
Funpark22 2025-04-10 11:01 p.m.
Who out of the 3?
Funpark22Who out of the 3?
Ted 2025-04-10 11:32 p.m.
The unknown person.
Funpark22 2025-04-10 11:36 p.m.
Alright
Funpark22 2025-04-10 11:37 p.m.@meowiitten I'm going to run this testimony by my AAG
Funpark22 2025-04-10 11:37 p.m.
For his approval
Funpark22 2025-04-10 11:37 p.m.
Remember how I said I was supervised deeply before opening statements
Funpark22sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 11:40 p.m.
If he's not on this case I don't want you running to him
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 11:40 p.m.
Are you done?
Funpark22 2025-04-10 11:40 p.m.
Let me see
TedThe unknown person.
Funpark22 2025-04-10 11:44 p.m.
What was in your inventory at the time of your death?
Ted 2025-04-10 11:45 p.m.
My wallet and a axe.
Funpark22 2025-04-10 11:46 p.m.
Look at the video again, are you sure it was an axe?
Funpark22Look at the video again, are you sure it was an axe?
Ted 2025-04-10 11:47 p.m.
Oh I am sorry it was a fishing pole.
Funpark22What was in your inventory at the time of your death?
polyrabies 2025-04-10 11:48 p.m.
objection
polyrabies 2025-04-10 11:48 p.m.
asked and answered
polyrabies 2025-04-10 11:48 p.m.
wrong
polyrabies 2025-04-10 11:48 p.m.
question
Funpark22Look at the video again, are you sure it was an axe?
polyrabies 2025-04-10 11:48 p.m.
objecting to this
Funpark22 2025-04-10 11:48 p.m.
The axe is most definitely not in the witness' inventory
polyrabies 2025-04-10 11:48 p.m.
He already answered
Funpark22 2025-04-10 11:48 p.m.
I'm trying to clarify the mistake and that it was actually a fishing pole
polyrabies 2025-04-10 11:48 p.m.
you cannot change his answer
polyrabies 2025-04-10 11:49 p.m.
hes answering under oath
TedThe unknown person.
Funpark22 2025-04-10 11:49 p.m.
Finally, what vehicle did this unknown person come from?
Funpark22Finally, what vehicle did this unknown person come from?
polyrabies 2025-04-10 11:50 p.m.
objection vague
Funpark22Finally, what vehicle did this unknown person come from?
Ted 2025-04-10 11:50 p.m.
The black sedan.
polyrabiesobjection vague
Funpark22 2025-04-10 11:51 p.m.
There's 3 answers. (1) The green van. (2) the Black sedan and (3) no idea. The witness is aware of where this unknown person came from as he's popped up at the very beginning when the witness was seized by zaivatore and his accomplices.
Funpark22There's 3 answers. (1) The green van. (2) the Black sedan and (3) no idea. The witness is aware of where this unknown person came from as he's popped up at the very beginning when ...
polyrabies 2025-04-10 11:51 p.m.
Still a vague question
polyrabies 2025-04-10 11:52 p.m.
and i dont believe its appropriate for u to suggest the possible answers
polyrabies 2025-04-10 11:52 p.m.
u should let the witness to give his own free minded and free willed responses
polyrabies 2025-04-10 11:52 p.m.
to ur questions
polyrabies 2025-04-10 11:52 p.m.
not indirectly provide him a list of answers
Funpark22 2025-04-10 11:52 p.m.
Witness already gave the response to the question
polyrabiesobjecting to this
Funpark22 2025-04-10 11:53 p.m.@meowiitten
polyrabiesobjection vague
Funpark22 2025-04-10 11:53 p.m.@meowiitten
polyrabiesobjecting to this
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 11:54 p.m.
Overruled
polyrabiesobjection vague
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 11:54 p.m.
Overruled
TedThey told me to follow their vehicle with one of their member which is zaivatore to sit in my vehicle incase of I running away.
Funpark22 2025-04-10 11:56 p.m.
What was the vehicle description you were told to follow?
polyrabies 2025-04-10 11:56 p.m.
Can we get a timelimit on the states examination
polyrabies 2025-04-10 11:56 p.m.@meowiitten
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 11:56 p.m.
No
Funpark22What was the vehicle description you were told to follow?
Ted 2025-04-10 11:57 p.m.
A black sedan that I believe can only buy from the Luxury Car Dealership in Lander City.
TedA black sedan that I believe can only buy from the Luxury Car Dealership in Lander City.
polyrabies 2025-04-10 11:57 p.m.
objection speculation
polyrabies 2025-04-10 11:58 p.m.
and relevance
Funpark22 2025-04-10 11:58 p.m.
What's irrelevant
Funpark22 2025-04-10 11:58 p.m.
What's being speculated?
polyrabies 2025-04-10 11:58 p.m.
"that I believe can only buy from the Luxury Car Dealership in Lander City."
Funpark22 2025-04-10 11:59 p.m.
I have no objection to that small part being taken out
Funpark22 2025-04-10 11:59 p.m.
It has no sustenance to the state's claim
polyrabies"that I believe can only buy from the Luxury Car Dealership in Lander City."
Funpark22 2025-04-10 11:59 p.m.
That small part being the replied
Funpark22 2025-04-10 11:59 p.m.
Is that bit of the answer what you find irrelevant as well?
polyrabies 2025-04-10 11:59 p.m.
ye
Funpark22It has no sustenance to the state's claim
Funpark22 2025-04-11 12:00 a.m.
I reiterate
Funpark22 2025-04-11 12:00 a.m.
"that I believe can only buy from the Luxury Car Dealership in Lander City." can be struck
TedI got stopped by JBellantoni, zaivatore and a unknow person.
Funpark22 2025-04-11 12:01 a.m.
Where was this?
Funpark22 2025-04-11 12:02 a.m.
If you can remember
polyrabiesobjection speculation
Funpark22 2025-04-11 12:02 a.m.@meowiitten
polyrabiesobjection speculation
sadoimpacto 2025-04-11 12:03 a.m.
Overruled
sadoimpacto 2025-04-11 12:03 a.m.
It's his impression
polyrabies 2025-04-11 12:03 a.m.
it's irrelevant
sadoimpacto 2025-04-11 12:03 a.m.
Move on
sadoimpacto 2025-04-11 12:03 a.m.
You don't talk back to me after I rule
polyrabies 2025-04-11 12:04 a.m.
soz
sadoimpacto 2025-04-11 12:04 a.m.@Funpark22 Continue
Funpark22Where was this?
Funpark22 2025-04-11 12:04 a.m.@Ted
Funpark22Where was this?
Ted 2025-04-11 12:04 a.m.
Highway toward Medford direction near the exit that is near Autozone car dealership.
Funpark22 2025-04-11 12:05 a.m.
What city has the autozone car dealership?
Funpark22 2025-04-11 12:05 a.m.
For this case
Funpark22 2025-04-11 12:05 a.m.
Just for record
Ted 2025-04-11 12:05 a.m.
Lander City.
Funpark22 2025-04-11 12:05 a.m.
So we can get the city, district, etc
Funpark22 2025-04-11 12:06 a.m.
That's all, your honor. I wish to ask the question of whether I'm able to object afterwards.
Funpark22 2025-04-11 12:06 a.m.
Like object to cross afterwarsd
Funpark22 2025-04-11 12:06 a.m.
after it's been asked
Funpark22 2025-04-11 12:06 a.m.
As I have school and I might not be able to object ASAP
polyrabies 2025-04-11 12:06 a.m.
defense has nothing for cross
Funpark22 2025-04-11 12:15 a.m.@meowiitten
sadoimpacto 2025-04-11 12:15 a.m.@polyrabies Any witness to call?
Funpark22 2025-04-11 12:15 a.m.
No discovery was given by the defense
polyrabies 2025-04-11 12:15 a.m.
No
Funpark22No discovery was given by the defense
Funpark22 2025-04-11 12:16 a.m.
to my knowledge\
sadoimpacto 2025-04-11 12:16 a.m.@Funpark22 Do you have another witness to call?
Funpark22 2025-04-11 12:16 a.m.
I only have 1 witness, your honor.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-11 12:16 a.m.
Alright then... are you both prepared for closing arguments?
Funpark22 2025-04-11 12:17 a.m.
I am
polyrabies 2025-04-11 12:17 a.m.
Yea
sadoimpacto 2025-04-11 12:17 a.m.@Funpark22 Go ahead.
Funpark22 2025-04-11 12:17 a.m.
Alright
sadoimpacto 2025-04-11 12:17 a.m.
Funpark22 2025-04-11 12:17 a.m.
I don't know when I can get this out
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:05 p.m.
Funpark22 2025-04-11 12:17 a.m.
But soon*
polyrabies 2025-04-11 12:17 a.m.
can I just send mine? i haev it prepared
polyrabies 2025-04-11 12:17 a.m.
so it makes this quicker
Funpark22 2025-04-11 12:17 a.m.
That's not how criminal procedure works
Funpark22 2025-04-11 12:17 a.m.
Defense has the last word
polyrabies 2025-04-11 12:17 a.m.
It's ok he can deviate from it
Funpark22 2025-04-11 12:18 a.m.
Don't our rules literally dictate the procedure for this
Funpark22 2025-04-11 12:18 a.m.
State opening
defense opening
state case in chief
defense case in chief
state closing
defense closing
defense opening
state case in chief
defense case in chief
state closing
defense closing
polyrabies 2025-04-11 12:18 a.m.
Hes a judge
polyrabies 2025-04-11 12:18 a.m.
he can deviate from this courts procedures
sadoimpacto 2025-04-11 12:19 a.m.
If you both agree to waive the procedure
polyrabies 2025-04-11 12:19 a.m.
I do
sadoimpacto 2025-04-11 12:19 a.m.
I can allow it
Funpark22 2025-04-11 12:19 a.m.
Will I be allowed to refute the defense's closing
Funpark22 2025-04-11 12:19 a.m.
As I know what he'll be saying
sadoimpacto 2025-04-11 12:19 a.m.
Yes
sadoimpacto 2025-04-11 12:19 a.m.
That's the disadvantage to him waiving
sadoimpacto 2025-04-11 12:19 a.m.
So he understands that by waiving
Funpark22 2025-04-11 12:19 a.m.
Alright, sure
Funpark22 2025-04-11 12:19 a.m.
State'll waive.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-11 12:19 a.m.@polyrabies Go ahead
polyrabies 2025-04-11 12:19 a.m.
Your honor, the State has failed to meet the burden of proof to convict my Client and have presented a case which lacks merit.
On Count 1 Kidnapping, which is defined as "Any person who uses force or fear to transport a person across a significant distance without their consent, shall be guilty of a felony.". Exhibit A fails to provide a full timeline of events and lacks critical context to be able to ascertain what truly happened within this purported "kidnapping", specifically the beginning of the video shows my Client and the "Victim" already in the van, it doesn't show the Victim being forced into the van or any use of fear or force to get the individual in the van and to transport the victim and my Client to transfer money as alleged by the state. You cannot possibly conclude that my Client utilised force or fear to get the individual in the van when the beginning of the video shows them already in the van. Infact this was everything short of a kidnapping, my Client is giving calm and collected instructions to the "Victim" to get him to a place, he doesn't utilise capitalisation to express fear or urgency of matter like a regular kidnapper would. For 90% of the "kidnapping incident" my Client has no firearm drawn or any weapon drawn, infact he only draws his firearm once due to a misclick which typically happens as Clark is a game, and we all tend to accidentally pull out our guns when we shouldn't. So tell me, how is this a kidnapping if my Client never used threats or force to compel the individual to drive. There may be once instance where my client accidentally discharged a firearm which only accounted for 2 seconds of the full alegged kidnapping which spans over 1 minute and 40 seconds. Infact my client has no ski mask on or any surgical gloves which criminal typically use to conceal crimes, and a crime of this caliber would prompt the use of concealment instructments which aren't present here.
On Count 1 Kidnapping, which is defined as "Any person who uses force or fear to transport a person across a significant distance without their consent, shall be guilty of a felony.". Exhibit A fails to provide a full timeline of events and lacks critical context to be able to ascertain what truly happened within this purported "kidnapping", specifically the beginning of the video shows my Client and the "Victim" already in the van, it doesn't show the Victim being forced into the van or any use of fear or force to get the individual in the van and to transport the victim and my Client to transfer money as alleged by the state. You cannot possibly conclude that my Client utilised force or fear to get the individual in the van when the beginning of the video shows them already in the van. Infact this was everything short of a kidnapping, my Client is giving calm and collected instructions to the "Victim" to get him to a place, he doesn't utilise capitalisation to express fear or urgency of matter like a regular kidnapper would. For 90% of the "kidnapping incident" my Client has no firearm drawn or any weapon drawn, infact he only draws his firearm once due to a misclick which typically happens as Clark is a game, and we all tend to accidentally pull out our guns when we shouldn't. So tell me, how is this a kidnapping if my Client never used threats or force to compel the individual to drive. There may be once instance where my client accidentally discharged a firearm which only accounted for 2 seconds of the full alegged kidnapping which spans over 1 minute and 40 seconds. Infact my client has no ski mask on or any surgical gloves which criminal typically use to conceal crimes, and a crime of this caliber would prompt the use of concealment instructments which aren't present here.
polyrabies 2025-04-11 12:20 a.m.
wait
polyrabies 2025-04-11 12:20 a.m.
wrong 1
polyrabies 2025-04-11 12:20 a.m.
wait no
polyrabies 2025-04-11 12:20 a.m.
On count 2 of Hijacking, Hijacking is defined as "Any person who forcefully steals an occupied vehicle shall be guilty of a felony..". At no point of time did my Client forcefully "steal" any vehicle, the Victim volunteerly allowed my Client to drive the vehicle, my Client even provided notice and made a request to drive his vehicle "let me drive", he said that extremely calmly while not having any firearm out or any weapon or making any threats, no utilisation of capitalisation to express urgency and inflict fear or intimidation, infact the state code clearly states the vehicle must be occupied, the vehicle was not occupied at the moment my Client got into the driver seat as the Victim got out for him to drive it. It's quite clear there's no hijacking, the victim isn't even in fear hes having a simple relaxed nonchalant conversation with my Client. No vehicle was hijacked, the vehicle was driven with consent of the owner.
There was no utilisation of force either, so quite simply my Client hasn't committed hijacking.
There was no utilisation of force either, so quite simply my Client hasn't committed hijacking.
polyrabies 2025-04-11 12:20 a.m.
On count 3 of Second Degree Murder, "Any person who intentionally kills another person with intent to kill or commit great bodily harm shall be guilty of a felony.". As Exhibit A clearly shows, at no point of time did my Client ever kill anyone or discharge a firearm at anyone, you cannot be guilty just because you're standing in a public area during the death of an individual.
polyrabies 2025-04-11 12:20 a.m.
That's all.
Funpark22 2025-04-11 12:20 a.m.
Alright
Funpark22 2025-04-11 12:20 a.m.
I'll come out with a closing probably tmr
Funpark22 2025-04-11 12:21 a.m.
It's 11:21 PM for me rn, I got school tmr.
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:05 p.m.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-11 05:16 p.m.@Funpark22
sadoimpacto 2025-04-11 07:57 p.m.@Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-04-11 09:09 p.m.
Will get this in soon
Funpark22 2025-04-11 10:42 p.m.
Hello, your honor. Lets do a little recap of this entire trial. The State established in his opening statements that the Defendant committed the acts of kidnapping, hijacking, and a vicarious second degree murder. Through a flurry of actions that led the victim and the defendant, around impoverished Lander, searching for a gas station. The goal of this was to simply to rob the victim of his money, but that didn't go to plan. Instead, this encounter ended up murdering the victim by an unknown person just because the Victim couldn't pay up. Let me back track to state that the this all started by the AutoZone Car Dealership in Lander. The Victim was approached by a few individuals, including the Defendant. The Victim was stopped with "their vehicles [in] front of me. The[y] hop[ped] out of their vehicle [and] pull[ed] out their weapon[s] on me and [told] me to give them my money." This was to then "[g]o to a nearby ATM." The Victim reportedly felt threatened. This then led to the driving on a Lander road to the ATM. But with a series of wrong turns, the following happened:
Funpark22 2025-04-11 10:42 p.m.
I'm going to go in order with hijacking first. The State should've proved beyond the reasonable doubt that the Defendant forcefully stole and occupied Tedroblox2022129's vehicle. At ~0:36-6 seconds within this trial's Exhibit A, we hear a gun shot. According to the victim the "[defendant] had shot his weapon." The Victim's inventory at the time only had a wallet and a fishing net (found later when he jumped out of his vehicle), and was driving. This is impossible for the victim to of posed a deadly threat to the Defendant, not warranting a shot from the Defendant. The Defendant then at at 00:52 of this trial's Exhibit A, we see the Defendant "[point] his weapon at me and say 'let me drive.'" The Victim again reported to feel threatened. As a result of being threatened, the Victim surrendered his vehicle to the Defendant. The victim decided to go into the passenger seat of his vehicle of fear that "he [would] possibly kill me." This brings me into the next section: kidnapping.
Funpark22 2025-04-11 10:42 p.m.
For Kidnapping, the State should've proved beyond the reasonable doubt that the Defendant forcefully transported the victim, Tedroblox2022129, over a significant distance. In this trial, you've heard that the Victim's vehicle was hijacked due to a series of wrong turns made by the Victim. The Defendant used force to get the Victim out of the vehicle. The Victim, in fear of being killed by running away was forced to sit back down in the passenger seat of his vehicle. The Defendant then drove to the gas station in this part of Lander. Being followed by a black sedan. This same black sedan was the vehicle that the Victim was instructed to follow but didn't follow it. At the gas station, the Defendant crashed the vehicle into a gas station at the station.
Funpark22 2025-04-11 10:42 p.m.
For Second-Degree Murder, the State should've proved beyond the reasonable doubt that the Defendant vicariously committed this act by aiding and abetting in the intentional killing of Tedroblox2022129. Tedroblox2022129 was killed with an intent to kill. Lets look at this time line. We've already seen that the Victim isn't in possession of a deadly weapon, was instructed to drive to an ATM to give money to either zaivatore, jbell, another person, or all 3. The Victim was instructed to drive to the ATM by following the black sedan but deviated paths. This resulted in the Defendant getting mad and proceeded to hijack the vehicle and then by being fearful of being killed, the Victim went into the vehicle's passenger seat. This Defendant then drove the Victim to the gas station. At this gas station, this victim tragically died by an unknown person. This unknown person was mentioned previously at the car dealership. It can be guessed that this person came out of the black sedan mentioned earlier. The state acknowledges that the Defendant didn't actually kill the Victim but did aid via driving the Defendant to the place where he'd be killed.
Funpark22 2025-04-11 10:42 p.m.
Now time for refutes. The Defense has stated that there's a general lack of context within Exhibit A to conclude kidnapping. But that's why we have witness testimony. The victim, in layperson perspective, has testified that he was fearful of being killed if he ran away. He was forced to stay with his vehicle. The Defense also states that the Defendant never forcefully made the Victim get in the vehicle at the start of the video, which is correct. The Defendant was in the passenger seat. This is not where the kidnapping happened. This happened later, after the hijacking of the vehicle. The Defense also misses the fact that the Defendant had a gun and fired within the
Funpark22 2025-04-11 10:43 p.m.
vehicle when the Defendant was driving just seconds before the hijacking and kidnapping. Instead, the Defense wipes off the usage of the gun seconds before the hijacking as a missclick. This court shouldn't fall into this trick. Miss clicks aren't excuses to fire weapons. The Defendant still used deadly force. Also, the Defense seems to only rely on a lack of capitalization as a form of non-force/fear. The victim even testified that he indeed was threatened by the guns and the weapons used against him. Also, the Defendant already had the intention to drive the Victim due to his want for money at the ATM. This plan was from the get-go. The Defense also wipes off the usage of the gun by only having 2 seconds out of the total video. This doesn't really matter considering using a gun is still using a gun. Firing a gun is still firing a gun. On top of that, the absense of items to conceal crimes isn't a valid defense in any fashion. The Defendant said "let me drive," held out a gun, and even previous fired a gun within the vehicle. This is
Funpark22 2025-04-11 10:43 p.m.
evident force. I still don't understand why the Defense is saying no force was used then quite literally discharging a firearm is force. In fact, the Defense even said he wasn't holding a firearm out. LOL. This totally happened. Look at 0:49--0:55 of Exhibit A. A firearm is most definitely out. Again, lack of capitalization isn't an excuse for a lack of force when a firearm was already fired. The Defense also makes the point that the vehicle wasn't occupied because the Victim got out for the Defendant to get in. Isn't that how hijacking works? You use force to get the driver out, so you can get in? Although the capitalization or lack thereof during the conversation seems to be nonchalant, the brandishing of a gun at the Victim says the opposite. Finally, the Defense states that "you cannot be guilty just because you're standing in a public area during the death of an individual." Which is right, but the Defendant in this case drove the Victim to where the Victim was going to be killed due to a lack of money to be given to his robbers. There's an entire string of events that the Defense is ignoring. It's almost like the Defense has ignored almost all of the testimony given from the Victim.
Funpark22 2025-04-11 10:43 p.m.
Now, after all of that yap. The State asks for the Defendant to be found guilty on all 3 charges, kidnapping, hijacking, and vicariously SDM on a basis of a beyond the reasonable doubt. The State's job is to get justice for the victims and the mayflowerians.
Funpark22 2025-04-11 10:43 p.m.@meowiitten
Funpark22 2025-04-11 10:43 p.m.
yappp
sadoimpacto 2025-04-11 11:06 p.m.
Okay. Thank you counsel.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-11 11:06 p.m.
I will begin my deliberations.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-11 11:06 p.m.
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:05 p.m.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-12 02:04 p.m.@Funpark22 @polyrabies @ز I have come to a verdict; I will deliver it today at 5:00 PM Eastern Time.
Funpark22 2025-04-12 02:35 p.m.
Godspeed
sadoimpacto 2025-04-12 05:10 p.m.@Funpark22 @polyrabies @ز The Court will now read its verdict.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-12 05:11 p.m.
The verdict is as follows:
sadoimpacto 2025-04-12 05:11 p.m.
District Court of the State of Mayflower
sadoimpacto 2025-04-12 05:11 p.m.
County of Clark
sadoimpacto 2025-04-12 05:12 p.m.
State of Mayflower v. ZaIvatore
sadoimpacto 2025-04-12 05:12 p.m.
Case Number CR-88-25
sadoimpacto 2025-04-12 05:12 p.m.
Presiding, Judge sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-12 05:12 p.m.
As to Count One, Kidnapping:
sadoimpacto 2025-04-12 05:12 p.m.
The Court finds the Defendant, ZaIvatore-
sadoimpacto 2025-04-12 05:12 p.m.
Guilty
sadoimpacto 2025-04-12 05:13 p.m.
As to Count Two, Hijacking:
sadoimpacto 2025-04-12 05:13 p.m.
The Court finds the Defendant, ZaIvatore-
sadoimpacto 2025-04-12 05:13 p.m.
Guilty.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-12 05:13 p.m.
As to Count Three, Second Degree Murder:
sadoimpacto 2025-04-12 05:13 p.m.
The Court finds the Defendant, ZaIvatore-
sadoimpacto 2025-04-12 05:13 p.m.
Guilty.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-12 05:14 p.m.
Dated, this 12th day of April, 2025
sadoimpacto 2025-04-12 05:14 p.m.
Signed, District Court Judge sadoimpacto
Funpark22 2025-04-12 05:14 p.m.
Thank you, your honor.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-12 05:16 p.m.VERDICT SHEET
@polyrabies @Funpark22 @ز
130.35 KB
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:05 p.m.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-12 05:18 p.m.@ز @polyrabies Do you have anything to add before I impose a sentence?
polyrabies 2025-04-12 05:28 p.m.
No
sadoimpacto 2025-04-12 06:09 p.m.@ز I will now pronounce your sentence:
As to Counts One and Two, I am sentencing you to 2 months of probation. During that period, you will not own, purchase, or attempt to acquire a firearm. You will not carry or possess ammunition. You are prohibited from using, possessing, receiving, transporting, or shipping any weapon, or any item that facilitates the operation of a weapon—including firearms and ammunition.
You will submit, without objection, to warrantless searches of your person, property, residence, or vehicle at any time by a Probation Officer or law enforcement.
You will notify any arresting law enforcement agency of your status as a person on probation. You will not associate with individuals who have 3 or more felony convictions or who are currently on probation or parole.
You will not commit any new criminal offenses—misdemeanor or felony—during the term of your probation. You will comply with all lawful instructions issued by your assigned Probation Officer, including appearing at specified locations, dates, and times.
You will be supervised by the Clark County Sheriff's Office during that period of time.@Sheriff of Clark County
If you violate any of these conditions, I will not hesitate to bring you back before this court. I will hold you in contempt for violating the terms of this sentence.
As to Count Three, I am committing you to the Department of Corrections in Lander City for a period of 40 minutes.
You will be eligible for expungement of all of these convictions after a period of 8 months.
As to Counts One and Two, I am sentencing you to 2 months of probation. During that period, you will not own, purchase, or attempt to acquire a firearm. You will not carry or possess ammunition. You are prohibited from using, possessing, receiving, transporting, or shipping any weapon, or any item that facilitates the operation of a weapon—including firearms and ammunition.
You will submit, without objection, to warrantless searches of your person, property, residence, or vehicle at any time by a Probation Officer or law enforcement.
You will notify any arresting law enforcement agency of your status as a person on probation. You will not associate with individuals who have 3 or more felony convictions or who are currently on probation or parole.
You will not commit any new criminal offenses—misdemeanor or felony—during the term of your probation. You will comply with all lawful instructions issued by your assigned Probation Officer, including appearing at specified locations, dates, and times.
You will be supervised by the Clark County Sheriff's Office during that period of time.
If you violate any of these conditions, I will not hesitate to bring you back before this court. I will hold you in contempt for violating the terms of this sentence.
As to Count Three, I am committing you to the Department of Corrections in Lander City for a period of 40 minutes.
You will be eligible for expungement of all of these convictions after a period of 8 months.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-12 06:09 p.m.SENTENCING ORDER; WARRANT OF COMMITMENT
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:05 p.m.
sadoimpactosadoimpacto 2025-04-12 06:10 p.m.
These sentences will run concurrent to each other, meaning you will serve them simultaneously.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-12 06:11 p.m.MINUTE ENTRY: Sentencing held on 4/12/2025 before Judge sadoimpacto as to ZAIVATORE (1): Counts 1, 2, and 3. Defendant sentenced to Forty (40) Minutes of Incarceration; Two (2) Months of Probation; and Eight (8) Months of Delayed Expungement Eligibility Under 5 M.S.C. 1 § 1503.1.
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:05 p.m.
sadoimpacto used /remove
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-12 06:15 p.m. @meowiitten has removed @Funpark22 from the case channel.
Case Modified
sadoimpacto used /remove
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-12 06:15 p.m. @meowiitten has removed @polyrabies from the case channel.
Case Modified
sadoimpacto used /remove
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-12 06:15 p.m. @meowiitten has removed @ز from the case channel.
Case Modified
sadoimpactosadoimpacto 2025-04-12 06:16 p.m.@Prothonotary's Office Please archive and transmit the judgment to the CCSO for enforcement!
BrendaPopplewell 2025-04-13 11:30 a.m.Proof of Ministerial Service
Pursuant to this Court's orders, I declare that service of the attached judgment has been made on the following individual–
Honoripedia, Sheriff
Clark County Sheriff's Office
Advise if you have any questions.
DONE AND ENTERED at St. Louis-Johnson Courthouse, Clark County, Mayflower (Room 324//Red Door).
BrendaPopplewell, Underprothonotary
Pursuant to this Court's orders, I declare that service of the attached judgment has been made on the following individual–
Honoripedia, Sheriff
Clark County Sheriff's Office
Advise if you have any questions.
BrendaPopplewell, Underprothonotary
cc:@meowiitten
BrendaPopplewell used /transcript
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-13 11:34 a.m.
Creating transcript..
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-13 11:34 a.m.
https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1329678726383927409/1361001713024368660 Successfully created transcript.
UserMessage could not be loaded.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-14 09:19 p.m.
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:05 p.m.
sadoimpacto used /summon
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-14 09:20 p.m.:white_check_mark: Successfully summoned @meowiitten (edited)
sadoimpacto used /summon
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-14 09:20 p.m.:white_check_mark: Successfully summoned @meowiitten (edited)
sadoimpacto used /summon
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-14 09:20 p.m.:white_check_mark: Successfully summoned @ز (edited)
sadoimpacto used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-14 09:21 p.m. @meowiitten has added @ز to the case channel.
Case Modified
sadoimpacto used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-14 09:21 p.m. @meowiitten has added @Funpark22 to the case channel.
Case Modified
sadoimpacto used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-14 09:21 p.m. @meowiitten has added @polyrabies to the case channel.
Case Modified
ز 2025-04-14 09:22 p.m.
here we go
ز 2025-04-14 09:24 p.m.
is this it , if not please tag me where it is
sadoimpactoClick to see attachment.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-14 09:28 p.m.@polyrabies @Funpark22 @ز We are here upon receipt of an affidavit detailing violation of the conditions of probation. Specifically, "[p]robationer arrived at the Clark County Sheriff’s Office HQ in Medford, traveling with two companions whom are known associates of the J&B Cold Cuts street gang... ," (Aff. at ¶ 4) which lead to the probation officer's death.
polyrabies 2025-04-14 09:32 p.m.
Wheres the affidavit?
ز 2025-04-14 09:33 p.m.
Can I use my lawyer this time
ز 2025-04-14 09:33 p.m.
First of all that was a mistake, and afterwards the probation officer understood the mistake and gave me a second chance
ز 2025-04-14 09:33 p.m.
To which the probation grace period search went clean
ز 2025-04-14 09:33 p.m.
I’d like my lawyer here please
ز 2025-04-14 09:33 p.m.
Before we carry on
polyrabies 2025-04-14 09:34 p.m.
im gonna have to withdraw from this, i was involved in the probation gc where this was discussed
ز 2025-04-14 09:35 p.m.
polyrabiesim gonna have to withdraw from this, i was involved in the probation gc where this was discussed
sadoimpacto 2025-04-14 09:36 p.m.
What groupchat?
sadoimpacto used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-14 09:37 p.m. @meowiitten has added @huddy. to the case channel.
Case Modified
sadoimpacto 2025-04-14 09:37 p.m.@huddy.
sadoimpacto used /remove
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-14 09:37 p.m. @meowiitten has removed @polyrabies from the case channel.
Case Modified
ز 2025-04-14 09:39 p.m.
Thx
sadoimpacto 2025-04-14 09:40 p.m.
I will have an order to show cause prepared in a timely manner
ز 2025-04-14 09:41 p.m.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-14 09:55 p.m.
The hearing will start tomorrow and it will be continuous(edited)
sadoimpacto 2025-04-14 09:55 p.m.
I'm waiting for @Funpark22 as well
ز 2025-04-14 09:55 p.m.
Alright
Funpark22 2025-04-14 09:56 p.m.
I'm reading up on the affidavit
Funpark22 2025-04-14 09:57 p.m.
I've read up on the affidavit
sadoimpactoThe hearing will start tomorrow and it will be continuous(edited)
Funpark22 2025-04-14 09:58 p.m.
A contempt hearing, or?
Funpark22A contempt hearing, or?
sadoimpacto 2025-04-14 09:58 p.m.
No probation revocation
sadoimpacto 2025-04-14 09:58 p.m.
But contempt is on the table as well. I have to write my order
Funpark22 2025-04-14 09:58 p.m.
Alright.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-14 10:40 p.m.SCHEDULING ORDER: Upon receipt of the Affidavit of Violation of Probation, a probation revocation hearing is hereby SCHEDULED for April 15, 2025, at 5:00 PM Eastern Time, to be conducted asynchronously via text submissions unless otherwise ordered by the Court. All filings, including any supplemental materials from the Probation Officer or the Defendant, shall be submitted no later than the scheduled hearing time. The standard of proof is a preponderance of evidence. Signed by District Judge sadoimpacto (SJI) (Entered: 04/14/2025)
@Funpark22 @huddy. @ز
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:05 p.m.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-14 10:51 p.m.
I also note for the record I will be typing up an order to show cause for criminal contempt. @Funpark22 @ز @huddy.
Funpark22 2025-04-14 10:51 p.m.
Ok
sadoimpactoFunpark22 2025-04-15 12:17 a.m.
Question.
Funpark22 2025-04-15 12:18 a.m.
1. Would you like me to turn over my dms with the Probation Officer?
2. Would I be able to call the Probation Officer up to testify on what happened?
2. Would I be able to call the Probation Officer up to testify on what happened?
Funpark221. Would you like me to turn over my dms with the Probation Officer? 2. Would I be able to call the Probation Officer up to testify on what happened?
sadoimpacto 2025-04-15 12:25 a.m.
Yes during the hearing
sadoimpacto 2025-04-15 12:26 a.m.
This isn’t like a conventional trial type hearing though
Funpark22 2025-04-15 12:26 a.m.
Would you like me to turn over my dms with the Probation Officer?
Funpark22 2025-04-15 12:26 a.m.
Before the scheduled hearing time
Funpark22 2025-04-15 12:26 a.m.
Or is that only pertaining to video evidnece
sadoimpacto 2025-04-15 12:26 a.m.
You don’t need to if they’re not exculpatory
Funpark22 2025-04-15 12:26 a.m.
evidence
sadoimpacto 2025-04-15 12:26 a.m.
Actually
sadoimpacto 2025-04-15 12:26 a.m.
This isn’t about guilt or innocence
Funpark22 2025-04-15 12:26 a.m.
I'm just dming the Probationary Officer on the details of what happened
sadoimpacto 2025-04-15 12:26 a.m.
So no you don’t need to
Funpark22 2025-04-15 12:27 a.m.
It's about whether probation should be denied or continued to be instated
Funpark22 2025-04-15 12:27 a.m.
Alright.
Funpark22 2025-04-15 12:31 a.m.@meowiitten Does your rule pertaining to 3 felonies apply to arrests or only COURT CONVICTIONS
Funpark22sadoimpacto 2025-04-15 12:33 a.m.
Both
Funpark22 2025-04-15 12:33 a.m.
So if a person the defendant is will has 3 felony arrests
Funpark22 2025-04-15 12:33 a.m.
That counts as violation?
sadoimpacto 2025-04-15 12:33 a.m.
Yes
sadoimpactoSo no you don’t need to
Funpark22 2025-04-15 12:33 a.m.
This pertains to all evidence, correct?
Funpark22This pertains to all evidence, correct?
sadoimpacto 2025-04-15 12:35 a.m.
All the evidence in the affidavit and the affidavit itself is what is being contemplated
Funpark22 2025-04-15 12:35 a.m.
Alright
sadoimpacto 2025-04-15 12:35 a.m.
But he's allowed to bring his own evidence
sadoimpacto 2025-04-15 12:36 a.m.
He has the same rights as he would in a trial but this is like a single hearing
sadoimpacto 2025-04-15 12:36 a.m.
And the standard of proof is preponderance not beyond a reasonable doubt(edited)
ز 2025-04-15 12:38 a.m.
Uh guys.
زUh guys.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-15 12:39 a.m.
Have you spoken to your lawyer yet?
sadoimpacto used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-15 12:40 a.m. @meowiitten has added @polyrabies to the case channel.
Case Modified
sadoimpacto 2025-04-15 12:40 a.m.@polyrabies You'll be on standby
sadoimpacto 2025-04-15 12:40 a.m.
You were not withdrawn from this case
sadoimpactoHave you spoken to your lawyer yet?
ز 2025-04-15 12:40 a.m.
The guy must be sleeping
ز 2025-04-15 12:41 a.m.
I reached out
polyrabies 2025-04-15 12:46 a.m.
Can I be withdrawn then?
polyrabies 2025-04-15 12:46 a.m.
I was involved in the parole GC
polyrabies 2025-04-15 12:46 a.m.
it's a major conflict of interest for me to be participating a in a parole hearing against my previous client
polyrabiesI was involved in the parole GC
sadoimpacto 2025-04-15 12:47 a.m.
It's probation not parole
polyrabies 2025-04-15 12:47 a.m.
Sorry, got it mixed up
polyrabies 2025-04-15 12:48 a.m.
wait no
polyrabies 2025-04-15 12:48 a.m.
the gc is literally titled
polyrabies 2025-04-15 12:48 a.m.
"CCSO parole"
polyrabies 2025-04-15 12:48 a.m. 
polyrabiesClick to see attachment.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-15 12:55 a.m.
You're part of the probation unit?
polyrabies 2025-04-15 12:55 a.m.
No there isnt a probation unit in ccso, but i am employed by ccso
polyrabies 2025-04-15 12:56 a.m.
Can I be withdrawn please?
sadoimpacto 2025-04-15 12:56 a.m.
Ugh
sadoimpacto used /remove
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-15 12:56 a.m. @meowiitten has removed @polyrabies from the case channel.
Case Modified
ز 2025-04-15 12:57 a.m.
Well
Funpark22 Server2025-04-15 08:59 a.m.
Funpark22 2025-04-15 08:59 a.m.@meowiitten Defendant was arrested in game
Funpark22 2025-04-15 08:59 a.m.
Submitting the evidence previous to our hearing
Funpark22 Server2025-04-15 09:00 a.m.
Funpark22 Server2025-04-15 09:00 a.m.
ز 2025-04-15 10:16 a.m.
ز 2025-04-15 10:34 a.m.@huddy.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-15 12:00 p.m.
I’ll have a PD on standby
sadoimpacto used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-15 12:05 p.m. @meowiitten has added @JaroCycle to the case channel.
Case Modified
sadoimpactosadoimpacto 2025-04-15 12:05 p.m.@JaroCycle Hearing begins at 5 PM EST today and it will be continuous asynchronous
JaroCycle 2025-04-15 12:06 p.m.
Understood,
ServerFunpark22Click to see attachment.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-15 12:10 p.m.
If you intend to call witnesses as to each exhibit just do a short list in the chat here and ping the PD
JaroCycle 2025-04-15 12:11 p.m.
Is it just me or the first portion of the video is incredibly blurry
JaroCycleUnderstood,
sadoimpacto 2025-04-15 12:11 p.m.
This hearing has the same rights as a regular trial so you can cross-examine and call your own witnesses
sadoimpacto 2025-04-15 12:11 p.m.
But the standard of proof is a preponderance of evidence
JaroCycleIs it just me or the first portion of the video is incredibly blurry
sadoimpacto 2025-04-15 12:11 p.m.
I haven’t watched anything yet
JaroCycle 2025-04-15 12:17 p.m.@meowiitten Your Honor, could you please link me to the message or the document detailing the probation conditions, if possible?
sadoimpactosadoimpacto 2025-04-15 12:18 p.m.@JaroCycle
JaroCycle 2025-04-15 12:18 p.m.
Appreciate it
sadoimpactoIf you intend to call witnesses as to each exhibit just do a short list in the chat here and ping the PD
Funpark22 2025-04-15 01:26 p.m.
can we push the hearing back to 10 pm czt today
Funpark22 2025-04-15 01:26 p.m.
i gotta get home, review the evidence, and get witnesses
Funpark22 2025-04-15 01:27 p.m.
i’m currently on my school ipad which is barely sufficient
Funpark22can we push the hearing back to 10 pm czt today
Funpark22 2025-04-15 01:27 p.m.
cst*
sadoimpactoIf you intend to call witnesses as to each exhibit just do a short list in the chat here and ping the PD
Funpark22 2025-04-15 01:29 p.m.
i’ll be on my school bus at 4 pm cst
sadoimpactoFunpark22 2025-04-15 01:29 p.m.
5 pm est is 4 pm cst
sadoimpacto 2025-04-15 01:29 p.m.
Its continuous and asynchronous
sadoimpacto 2025-04-15 01:29 p.m.
That's just the start time
Funpark22 2025-04-15 01:29 p.m.
Alright
sadoimpacto 2025-04-15 02:21 p.m.SHOW CAUSE ORDER
@ز @JaroCycle
277.81 KB
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:05 p.m.
huddy. 2025-04-15 03:44 p.m.
Howdy
huddy. 2025-04-15 03:44 p.m.
Here as Defendant's attorney
sadoimpactoFunpark22 2025-04-15 09:51 p.m.@meowiitten May I begin with opening statements?
Funpark22sadoimpacto 2025-04-15 09:51 p.m.
Yes
Funpark22 2025-04-15 10:13 p.m.
Alright, your honor. Apologies on this delay I had to resign from a judiciary spot in cannuck's British Columbia. Onto this case,
I'm going to skip context on why the Defendant is even a Defendant because of this trial just ending. Your honor, we're given a very simple video. Allegedly 2 people were with the Defendant. Defendant was being searched by the Probation Officer as part of a grace period to turn over any and all firearms, ammo, and anything of that nature. During the detainment to be searched, an unnamed individual left the vehicle and proceeded to fire upon the Probation Officer and the Defendant. The Defendant died as a result. On another occurrence, the Defendant was arrested for a crime in Mersea by proper authorities.
You'll hear from@Raymond Reddington who will shine light on the incidents as the Probation Officer. He'll explain the individuals within the vehicle and any other key factors that are beneficial to the State's objective for this hearing. Using the testimony given by the Deputy, I'll connect that to a violation of the probation rules set out by your honor. (As I believe these hearings will allow for verbal argumentation on top of witness testimony.
It is my job as the State's Representative in this case to prove on the preponderance of evidence that the Defendant more likely than not committed act(s) that concluded he broke probation rules.
PS:@JaroCycle or @huddy. , whoever is defending: DivineSalazar, Lay, D:385642370882076672. If y'all want roblox profile IDs, I'll get that.
I'm going to skip context on why the Defendant is even a Defendant because of this trial just ending. Your honor, we're given a very simple video. Allegedly 2 people were with the Defendant. Defendant was being searched by the Probation Officer as part of a grace period to turn over any and all firearms, ammo, and anything of that nature. During the detainment to be searched, an unnamed individual left the vehicle and proceeded to fire upon the Probation Officer and the Defendant. The Defendant died as a result. On another occurrence, the Defendant was arrested for a crime in Mersea by proper authorities.
You'll hear from
It is my job as the State's Representative in this case to prove on the preponderance of evidence that the Defendant more likely than not committed act(s) that concluded he broke probation rules.
PS:
Funpark22 2025-04-15 10:14 p.m.@meowiitten ^^^^^
JaroCycle 2025-04-16 03:35 a.m.
Your Honor,
First of all, I will start with the shooting incident then move on onto the Mersea incident.
My client, the defendant has submitted willingly and according to the probation rules set out by you Judge to a mandatory search for all ammunition and firearms. The prosecution alledges that individuals who shot both the defendant and the probation officer acted on behalf of the defendant. There is no proof backing that allegation up. Furthermore,People v. Galvan, 155 Cal.App.4th 978 (2007) holds that a probationer cannot be found in violation unless the violation was willful. In this case it is quite the opposite. The Defense will present arguments, that this assumed probation rules was not a thing in this incident, and the prosecution uses the sheer fact that someone shot both the Probation Officer and the defendant is enough to accuse that this incident was orchestrated by my client.
The Defense will present arguments in this case to prove, that the Defendant's actions were in violation of the probation rules, and should not result in a probation revokation.
First of all, I will start with the shooting incident then move on onto the Mersea incident.
My client, the defendant has submitted willingly and according to the probation rules set out by you Judge to a mandatory search for all ammunition and firearms. The prosecution alledges that individuals who shot both the defendant and the probation officer acted on behalf of the defendant. There is no proof backing that allegation up. Furthermore,
The Defense will present arguments in this case to prove, that the Defendant's actions were in violation of the probation rules, and should not result in a probation revokation.
JaroCycle 2025-04-16 03:36 a.m.@meowiitten @Funpark22 ^^
Funpark22 2025-04-16 08:39 a.m.
I call @Raymond Reddington then I will give some verbal arguments
sadoimpacto used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-16 10:31 a.m. @meowiitten has added @Raymond Reddington to the case channel.
Case Modified
sadoimpacto 2025-04-16 10:31 a.m.@Raymond Reddington Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?
sadoimpacto
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 05:04 p.m.
I do.(edited)
sadoimpacto 2025-04-16 05:05 p.m.@Funpark22 Proceed
Funpark22 2025-04-16 05:10 p.m.
Will do once I do my reading for school and possibly dinner
ز 2025-04-16 08:25 p.m.
Read and eat well
Funpark22 2025-04-16 09:04 p.m.
Alright, @Raymond Reddington , how are you doing today?
Funpark22Alright, @Raymond Reddington , how are you doing today?
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 09:31 p.m.
Doing good lets begin
sadoimpacto 2025-04-16 09:35 p.m.@Funpark22
Raymond ReddingtonDoing good lets begin
Funpark22 2025-04-16 09:38 p.m.
Great to hear. Do you remember this exhibit? https://gyazo.com/bba15556d50a9ead588d3f7b2ee53075
Funpark22Great to hear. Do you remember this exhibit? https://gyazo.com/bba15556d50a9ead588d3f7b2ee53075
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 09:42 p.m.
yes
Funpark22 2025-04-16 09:42 p.m.
What is this exhibit?
Funpark22 2025-04-16 09:42 p.m.
Actaully
Funpark22 2025-04-16 09:42 p.m.
no
Funpark22 2025-04-16 09:42 p.m.
don't answer
Funpark22 2025-04-16 09:42 p.m.@meowiitten Can I ask a different question previous?
Funpark22 2025-04-16 09:42 p.m.
I will still ask that question^^^6
Funpark22 2025-04-16 09:42 p.m.
^^^*
Funpark22sadoimpacto 2025-04-16 09:42 p.m.
You can walk back yes
Funpark22 2025-04-16 09:43 p.m.
Perfect
sadoimpacto 2025-04-16 09:43 p.m.
Bear in mind the exhibit is not admitted yet
Funpark22 2025-04-16 09:43 p.m.
I know
Funpark22 2025-04-16 09:43 p.m.@Raymond Reddington Can you point yourself out within that exhibit?
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 09:43 p.m.
the one that says Salazar..?
Funpark22 2025-04-16 09:44 p.m.
Perfect
Funpark22 2025-04-16 09:44 p.m.@Raymond Reddington What is this exhibit?
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 09:44 p.m.
me speaking with zalvatore
Funpark22 2025-04-16 09:45 p.m.@meowiitten I ask to make this Exhibit A of this hearing's record
Funpark22 2025-04-16 09:45 p.m.
For clarification the gyazo video
Funpark22sadoimpacto 2025-04-16 09:46 p.m.
If you could ask him when the conversation took place for the record as well
sadoimpacto 2025-04-16 09:46 p.m.
Then I will admit
Funpark22 2025-04-16 09:46 p.m.@Raymond Reddington When did this conversation take place?
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 09:46 p.m.
2 days ago as you can see in the video..(edited)
Funpark22 2025-04-16 09:46 p.m.@meowiitten
sadoimpacto 2025-04-16 09:46 p.m.
Admitted
Funpark22 2025-04-16 09:46 p.m.
What's your job within the Sheriff's Office? @Raymond Reddington
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 09:46 p.m.
Detective with the Criminal Investigations Division
Funpark22 2025-04-16 09:46 p.m.
What's your job with the defendant as a detective?
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 09:47 p.m.
well. probation officer
Funpark22 2025-04-16 09:47 p.m.
Can you please state all of the probation rules for the defendant set out by your honor?
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 09:48 p.m.
- No possession, purchase, or attempt to acquire firearms or ammunition.
- No possession of any weapon or items used to facilitate the operation of a weapon.
- Submit to warrantless searches of person, property, residence, or vehicle at any time.
- Notify law enforcement of probation status upon arrest or official contact.
- No association with individuals with 3+ felony convictions or those on probation/parole.
- No commission of any criminal offense—misdemeanor or felony.
- Full compliance with all lawful directives of assigned Probation Officer.
- Appear for scheduled meetings and check-ins as directed.
- No possession of any weapon or items used to facilitate the operation of a weapon.
- Submit to warrantless searches of person, property, residence, or vehicle at any time.
- Notify law enforcement of probation status upon arrest or official contact.
- No association with individuals with 3+ felony convictions or those on probation/parole.
- No commission of any criminal offense—misdemeanor or felony.
- Full compliance with all lawful directives of assigned Probation Officer.
- Appear for scheduled meetings and check-ins as directed.
Funpark22 2025-04-16 09:48 p.m.
With firearms and ammunition, how did you try to ensure that the defendant didn't break this rule?
Funpark22With firearms and ammunition, how did you try to ensure that the defendant didn't break this rule?
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 09:49 p.m.
I offered him a grace period in which he'd give up any and all firearms and related ammo to me
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 09:49 p.m.
because
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 09:50 p.m.
he wasn't allowed legal firearms, and may likely have had legal and/or illegal firearms in his vehicles still before the probation/case(edited)
Funpark22Great to hear. Do you remember this exhibit? https://gyazo.com/bba15556d50a9ead588d3f7b2ee53075
Funpark22 2025-04-16 09:50 p.m.
And what was the purpose of the conversation in Exhibit A?
Funpark22 2025-04-16 09:50 p.m.
At first
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 09:50 p.m.
offering him the grace period to give up guns etc(edited)
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 09:50 p.m.
to which he accepted
Funpark22 2025-04-16 09:50 p.m.
Do not edit any messages
Funpark22 2025-04-16 09:51 p.m.
Just going to state that
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 09:51 p.m.
what if I forgot to add something
Funpark22 2025-04-16 09:51 p.m.
I believe the judge and everyone viewing this record wants to have exactly what you say and when.
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 09:52 p.m.
Okay.
Raymond Reddingtonwhat if I forgot to add something
Funpark22 2025-04-16 09:52 p.m.
[edit]*
Funpark22 2025-04-16 09:52 p.m.
What was your method for him to give up the guns?
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 09:52 p.m.
just having him come ingame and we search his vehicles and person
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 09:52 p.m.
then after he was released
Funpark22 2025-04-16 09:53 p.m.25 Views. Watch Roblox and millions of other Roblox videos captured using Medal. 
Do you remember this? https://medal.tv/games/roblox/clips/k5xpXW6iCO-6W46s5?invite=cr-MSx3RW4sMTY2MjEzNzY
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 09:54 p.m.
yes
Raymond Reddingtonyes
Funpark22 2025-04-16 09:54 p.m.
Can you point yourself out?
ز 2025-04-16 09:54 p.m.
If i could lean back on my chair with a smug smirk i would
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 09:55 p.m.
the man with brown uniform
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 09:55 p.m.
white skirt
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 09:55 p.m.
skin
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 09:55 p.m.
not skirt
Raymond Reddingtonnot skirt
Funpark22 2025-04-16 09:55 p.m.
Where does this exhibit take place?
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 09:55 p.m.
clark county sheriff's office, medford
Funpark22 2025-04-16 09:55 p.m.@meowiitten I ask to admit this as exhibit B of this hearing's record.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-16 09:56 p.m.
Admitted
Raymond Reddingtonclark county sheriff's office, medford
Funpark22 2025-04-16 09:56 p.m.
Within this exhibit, what do you appear to be doing at ~1 second to ~2 seconds?
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 09:56 p.m.
detaining and moving zalvatore
Funpark22 2025-04-16 09:56 p.m.
For what purpose?
زIf i could lean back on my chair with a smug smirk i would
sadoimpacto 2025-04-16 09:57 p.m.
Do not interrupt
sadoimpacto 2025-04-16 09:57 p.m.
Final warning
Funpark22For what purpose?
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 09:57 p.m.
in preparation for the search
Funpark22 2025-04-16 09:58 p.m.
Circling back, at about ~00:00 thought ~00:02, what's the contests of the parking lot?
Funpark22 2025-04-16 09:58 p.m.
contents*
Funpark22 2025-04-16 09:58 p.m.
what are*
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 10:00 p.m.
a car
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 10:00 p.m.
parking bays
Funpark22 2025-04-16 10:00 p.m.
What appeared to the contents of the car?
Funpark22 2025-04-16 10:01 p.m.
to be the*
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 10:01 p.m.
two associates of Zalvatore
Funpark22 2025-04-16 10:02 p.m.
What appeared to be their usernames?
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 10:02 p.m.
NBellantoni, MBellantoni
Funpark22 2025-04-16 10:03 p.m.
Following you detaining the defendant, what happened from ~2 seconds all the way to the end of the clip at ~10 seconds?
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 10:03 p.m.
as I went to bring him to the bay we were opened fire upon by one of his associates, resulting in Zals death
ServerFunpark22Click to see attachment.
Funpark22 2025-04-16 10:06 p.m.@Raymond Reddington Do you recognize this?
Funpark22 2025-04-16 10:06 p.m. 
Funpark22Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 10:07 p.m.
yes sir
Raymond Reddingtonyes sir
Funpark22 2025-04-16 10:07 p.m.
Can you point yourself out?
Funpark22Can you point yourself out?
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 10:08 p.m.
i believe.. its the one whose named Salazar and has my exact profile picture.
Raymond Reddingtoni believe.. its the one whose named Salazar and has my exact profile picture.
Funpark22 2025-04-16 10:08 p.m.
What is this exhibit?
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 10:09 p.m.
me speaking to an law enforcement officer
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 10:09 p.m.
who
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 10:09 p.m.
informed me of him arresting zalvatore
Raymond Reddingtoninformed me of him arresting zalvatore
Funpark22 2025-04-16 10:09 p.m.
When did this conversation take place?
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 10:10 p.m.
15/04/2025
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 10:10 p.m.
so 2 days agp
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 10:10 p.m.
ago
Funpark22 2025-04-16 10:10 p.m.
I request to make this exhibit C for all intents and purposes of the record for this hearing @meowiitten
sadoimpacto 2025-04-16 10:11 p.m.
Ok admitted
Funpark22 2025-04-16 10:12 p.m.@Raymond Reddington Can you describe what you were notified of?
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 10:13 p.m.
zalvatore being arrested like I said above
Raymond Reddingtonzalvatore being arrested like I said above
Funpark22 2025-04-16 10:14 p.m.
What was the instance of the arrest you were notified/informed about?
Funpark22What was the instance of the arrest you were notified/informed about?
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 10:14 p.m.
what do you mean by that, the charges?
Funpark22 2025-04-16 10:14 p.m.
The description of the charges - why he was arrested.
Funpark22The description of the charges - why he was arrested.
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 10:16 p.m.
he was arrested for: Evasion, Unlicensed possession of ammunition, Unlicensed possession of a firearm, Unlicensed possession of non-civilian equipment.
Funpark22 2025-04-16 10:16 p.m.
Describe the arrest report. Essentially the officer's first message with you.
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 10:18 p.m.
well he dmed me and said he spoke to judge sado who told him to speak to me regarding a probationary, in this case Zal
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 10:18 p.m.
he said he needed to file some paper work regarding zals felony arrests
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 10:18 p.m.
which was essentially him just
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-16 10:18 p.m.
showing me the arrest log etc
Funpark22 2025-04-16 10:19 p.m.
Ok
Funpark22 2025-04-16 10:19 p.m.
That's all. @meowiitten
Funpark22 2025-04-16 10:19 p.m.
I yield for any cross. Then I have some verbal args.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-16 10:22 p.m.@JaroCycle Your witness
JaroCycleYour Honor, First of all, I will start with the shooting incident then move on onto the Mersea incident. My client, the defendant has submitted willingly and according to the pr...
Funpark22 2025-04-16 10:22 p.m.
I don't think they have a witness, your honor.
Funpark22 2025-04-16 10:22 p.m.
Oh, are you saying that divine is their witness to now cross?
Funpark22 2025-04-16 10:22 p.m.
If so, mb
Funpark22 2025-04-16 10:23 p.m.@meowiitten
sadoimpacto 2025-04-16 10:24 p.m.
Yes, to cross
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-17 12:45 a.m.@Funpark22 @meowiitten your honor, prosecutor, i have been given further evidence regarding zalvatores misconduct by the same person who provided me the arrest report 2 days ago
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-17 12:45 a.m.
i was just dmed by the same officer
Raymond Reddingtoni was just dmed by the same officer
sadoimpacto 2025-04-17 12:49 a.m.
Can you please file it with the prosecutor?
sadoimpacto 2025-04-17 12:49 a.m.
Or, actually
Raymond Reddingtonsadoimpacto 2025-04-17 12:50 a.m.
Submit it here
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-17 12:58 a.m.
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1346744349798694982/1362287623552368753/NVIDIA_Overlay_iAQThtSy8r.png?ex=6801d8b7&is=68008737&hm=f9e78e2d53922c7febfcf75a2c5fc71743ad82db8b559d2aab516b376466d48a&
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1346744349798694982/1362287623904694374/NVIDIA_Overlay_wezM1pk0Zy.jpg?ex=6801d8b7&is=68008737&hm=a095f412231c11ef53b0f668074551052ec2531565ef76f81e2e08653624c7fa&
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1346744349798694982/1362287623904694374/NVIDIA_Overlay_wezM1pk0Zy.jpg?ex=6801d8b7&is=68008737&hm=a095f412231c11ef53b0f668074551052ec2531565ef76f81e2e08653624c7fa&
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-17 12:58 a.m.
cc: @meowiitten
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-17 12:59 a.m.
I want the court to be aware that zalvatore has changed his roblox username to "ZBellantoni"
Raymond Reddingtonsadoimpacto 2025-04-17 01:23 a.m.
For the record, can you identify any associates of his if they are relevant to the origin or credibility of this evidence?
UserMessage could not be loaded.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-17 01:29 a.m.
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:05 p.m.
Funpark22I yield for any cross. Then I have some verbal args.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-17 01:29 a.m.@JaroCycle Do you have any cross-examination?
sadoimpactoFor the record, can you identify any associates of his if they are relevant to the origin or credibility of this evidence?
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-17 01:34 a.m.
i asked the officer if he had any further proof like video evidence (awaiting) and ill ask him about that too your honor
sadoimpacto 2025-04-17 01:35 a.m.
I have expanded the scope of the show cause order and upped the ante on punishment. I will also be issuing a bench warrant given the continuous violations in defiance of my sentencing order. I am establishing that there is probable cause to find him in contempt of court to issue the warrant.
@Funpark22 @JaroCycle
sadoimpacto 2025-04-17 01:35 a.m.
This hearing will continue; the show cause hearing will continue as planned
sadoimpacto used /remove
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-17 01:42 a.m. @meowiitten has removed @ز from the case channel.
Case Modified
sadoimpacto 2025-04-17 01:42 a.m.@Raymond Reddington I want you to make note of the names of any individuals that might be assisting him as well
sadoimpactoJaroCycle 2025-04-17 04:51 a.m.
Yes, just one.
Raymond Reddingtontwo associates of Zalvatore
JaroCycle 2025-04-17 04:52 a.m.
You seem to have excellent knowledge of who was inside mr. Zalvatore car, yet there is no evidence supporting that claim
JaroCycle 2025-04-17 04:53 a.m.
Is there any hard proof that the two individuals you named are the ones who shot you?
JaroCycleYou seem to have excellent knowledge of who was inside mr. Zalvatore car, yet there is no evidence supporting that claim
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-17 05:17 a.m.
I personally checked the vehicle
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-17 05:17 a.m.
myself
JaroCycle 2025-04-17 05:22 a.m.
So you want this court to trust only your eyes that you saw these exact two individuals?
JaroCycle 2025-04-17 05:22 a.m.
It was quite dark as well,
JaroCycleIs there any hard proof that the two individuals you named are the ones who shot you?
JaroCycle 2025-04-17 05:23 a.m.
So there is no proof of identification of the assumed associates correct? @Raymond Reddington
JaroCycleIt was quite dark as well,
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-17 05:34 a.m.
Actually my dear sir, I pointed my camera inside of the vehicle and got their usernames directly. This is when I informed Zalvatore he shouldn't be associating with organized crime members apart of declared street gangs.
Zalvatore was a witness to this as well. he saw me approach the vehicle because we had a conversation about. Ask him about it, under aoth.
Zalvatore was a witness to this as well. he saw me approach the vehicle because we had a conversation about. Ask him about it, under aoth.
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-17 05:34 a.m.
under oath*
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-17 05:35 a.m.
we had a conversation about the associating*
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-17 05:35 a.m.
I did not get the usernames from afar. The shooting happened around 2ish minutes after I was having a conversation with Zalvatore and checked to see who he was traveling with. The vehicle was parked
Raymond ReddingtonActually my dear sir, I pointed my camera inside of the vehicle and got their usernames directly. This is when I informed Zalvatore he shouldn't be associating with organized crime...
JaroCycle 2025-04-17 05:38 a.m.
But you don't have any proof of that
JaroCycle 2025-04-17 05:38 a.m.
?
JaroCycleBut you don't have any proof of that
Raymond Reddington 2025-04-17 05:41 a.m.
I don't have physical proof no.
JaroCycle 2025-04-17 05:42 a.m.
Okay thanks no further questions
Funpark22 2025-04-17 08:37 a.m.
Will begin my verbal args today
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 12:18 a.m.@Funpark22 Your closing arguments, please
Funpark22Will begin my verbal args today
Funpark22 2025-04-18 12:18 a.m.@meowiitten
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 12:18 a.m.
Unless you are calling someone else
Funpark22 2025-04-18 12:19 a.m.
Are we not doing verbal args for this case
Funpark22 2025-04-18 12:19 a.m.
or are we straight going into closing
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 12:19 a.m.
No. Just closing
Funpark22 2025-04-18 12:19 a.m.
Alright
Funpark22 2025-04-18 12:19 a.m.
Will give closing soon
sadoimpactoNo. Just closing
Funpark22 2025-04-18 03:53 a.m.
I currently need to go to sleep. Will give this later today on 4/18/2025
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 07:39 p.m.@Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-04-18 07:44 p.m.
Currently having dinner and going to the library
Funpark22 2025-04-18 07:44 p.m.
Will give when I get back
Funpark22 2025-04-18 09:32 p.m.
Alright, your honor.
Lets start with the shooting incident as that's why we're here. You've heard from the Probation Officer who lists out a key rule. The key rule is the rule to not involve oneself with those on probation or 3+ felony convictions. You clarified later that the convictions[ extended to arrests as well.](https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1351430325754003476/1361560053752139776). But lets backtrack. Lets think about the Defendant as who he is. The Defendant is in a gang called the [J&B Cold Cuts](https://www.roblox.com/communities/35519670/J-B-Cold-Cuts) as one of the 'Head [B]utchers" as of 4/18/2025 at 8:06 PM CST. So we know that the Defendant is a part of a gang that is known to operate in Clark as the owner of the group has the username of "JBellantoni" who was plea dealt out of this case. Within that same gang, we see 2 members that the Probation Officer mentioned were in the car. That being [NBellantoni](https://www.roblox.com/users/1786220990/profile?friendshipSourceType=PlayerSearch), a head butcher, and [MBellantoni](https://www.roblox.com/users/510229134/profile?friendshipSourceType=PlayerSearch), a head butcher. This incident took place at CCSO, where the Defendant was to turn over any and all ammo and firearms to the Probation Officer.See hearing's Exhibit A. Now, the most shocking part of this is that both N and MBellantoni have a ton of felonies on their record. In fact, myself and my paralegal counted. As of 4/14/2025, MBellantoni had 16 felonies on their record. Felonies like unlicensed possession of a firearm to first-degree murder. But that's not even the worst part. NBellantoni, on the other hand, as of 4/14/2025 had a total of about 40 felonies. This ranges from again unlicensed possession of a firearm to first-degree murder. Records were found on the clark county courts website.
Lets start with the shooting incident as that's why we're here. You've heard from the Probation Officer who lists out a key rule. The key rule is the rule to not involve oneself with those on probation or 3+ felony convictions. You clarified later that the convictions[ extended to arrests as well.](https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1351430325754003476/1361560053752139776). But lets backtrack. Lets think about the Defendant as who he is. The Defendant is in a gang called the [J&B Cold Cuts](https://www.roblox.com/communities/35519670/J-B-Cold-Cuts) as one of the 'Head [B]utchers" as of 4/18/2025 at 8:06 PM CST. So we know that the Defendant is a part of a gang that is known to operate in Clark as the owner of the group has the username of "JBellantoni" who was plea dealt out of this case. Within that same gang, we see 2 members that the Probation Officer mentioned were in the car. That being [NBellantoni](https://www.roblox.com/users/1786220990/profile?friendshipSourceType=PlayerSearch), a head butcher, and [MBellantoni](https://www.roblox.com/users/510229134/profile?friendshipSourceType=PlayerSearch), a head butcher. This incident took place at CCSO, where the Defendant was to turn over any and all ammo and firearms to the Probation Officer.
Funpark22 2025-04-18 09:32 p.m.
For the reasonable person to believe, your honor, it is more likely than not that the Defendant operated with and were around NBellantoni and MBellantoni who are in the same gang and has/had a staggering amount of felonies. CLEARLY violating your rule for the Defendant's probation entailing not be around those with probation and those with 3+ convictions of felonies on the preponderance of the evidence provided.
Now, for his first arrest. You've heard from the Probation Officer that he received DMs from xero_c. It was exemplified that the Defendant was arrested for: Evasion, Unlicensed possession of ammunition, Unlicensed possession of a firearm, and Unlicensed possession of non-civilian equipment. This Defendant clearly doesn't understand that getting arrested with a felony violates this probation's rules. According to the clark county courts website and the Probation Officer's dms with xero_c, he was arrested for:
On top of that the Probation Officer showed some [evidence of the arrest](https://youtu.be/AXhZeUafGOc). In fact, the arresting officer was notified by the Defendant that he was "on probation." At least the defendant knows to notify law enforcement but not interact with gang members and be arrested for felonies. It was the State's job to prove on the preponderance of the evidence that the Defendant more likely than not violated the probation rules by being arrested.
Now, for his first arrest. You've heard from the Probation Officer that he received DMs from xero_c. It was exemplified that the Defendant was arrested for: Evasion, Unlicensed possession of ammunition, Unlicensed possession of a firearm, and Unlicensed possession of non-civilian equipment. This Defendant clearly doesn't understand that getting arrested with a felony violates this probation's rules. According to the clark county courts website and the Probation Officer's dms with xero_c, he was arrested for:
"Mersea; Cube; subject was the passenger of a Coin Van fleeing police with two other ro-mob affiliated occupants. This subject and another passenger jumped out of the coin van simultaniously behind Cube, attempting to enter another vehicle. Subject then fled on foot and was tased. Subject found with R21AA and several 5.56 high capacity magazines. Gun was loaded with one in the chamber."
On top of that the Probation Officer showed some [evidence of the arrest](https://youtu.be/AXhZeUafGOc). In fact, the arresting officer was notified by the Defendant that he was "on probation." At least the defendant knows to notify law enforcement but not interact with gang members and be arrested for felonies. It was the State's job to prove on the preponderance of the evidence that the Defendant more likely than not violated the probation rules by being arrested.
Funpark22 2025-04-18 09:32 p.m.
Finally, the most recent incident. It was stated by xero_c that he was "rolling around blatantly w[ith] roitalians shooting up cops currently." Again, it is more likely than not that the Defendant was with the ro-italians of the J&B Cold Cuts Gang. We already know that the 2 people earlier that the Defendant was with had felonies. It's more likely than not that the ro-italians of the J&B Colt Cuts Gang were committing a crime of "shooting up cops." If the Defendant was shooting with his fellow gang members, he'd be violating your probation rule on being in possession of ammo and firearms.
Overall, it's the State's job to prove that the Defendant more likely than not on the grounds of the preponderance of the evidence, violated the probation rules set out by your honor by interacting with those with 3+ felony arrests, being in possession of a firearm and ammunition, and getting arrested.
Overall, it's the State's job to prove that the Defendant more likely than not on the grounds of the preponderance of the evidence, violated the probation rules set out by your honor by interacting with those with 3+ felony arrests, being in possession of a firearm and ammunition, and getting arrested.
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 09:34 p.m.@JaroCycle Your closing statements?
JaroCycle 2025-04-19 04:56 a.m.
Your Honor,
My client has followed probation rules implemented by you judge, till the unfortunate incidents of his arrests. Arrests, where only one was presented with evidence, the other is covered with accusations and assumptions rather than factual evidence - talking about the incident where my client during the search by his Probation Officer was shot and killed by assumed associates.
The state blatantly assumes, that my clients past of co-operating with ro-Italians is enough to assume that if members of the J&B Colt Cuts Gang were committing a crime of "shooting up cops'' my client did the same, and again they do not present any evidence supporting that.
Yes, my client was arrested, but again during his time on probation, he followed all other regulations, was searched and during those searches nothing illegal was uncovered. Therefore I ask the court that if the probation is to be revoked, a less harsh sentence to be implemented, or the period of the probation to be extended for additional week.
My client has followed probation rules implemented by you judge, till the unfortunate incidents of his arrests. Arrests, where only one was presented with evidence, the other is covered with accusations and assumptions rather than factual evidence - talking about the incident where my client during the search by his Probation Officer was shot and killed by assumed associates.
The state blatantly assumes, that my clients past of co-operating with ro-Italians is enough to assume that if members of the J&B Colt Cuts Gang were committing a crime of "shooting up cops'' my client did the same, and again they do not present any evidence supporting that.
Yes, my client was arrested, but again during his time on probation, he followed all other regulations, was searched and during those searches nothing illegal was uncovered. Therefore I ask the court that if the probation is to be revoked, a less harsh sentence to be implemented, or the period of the probation to be extended for additional week.
JaroCycle 2025-04-19 04:56 a.m.@meowiitten
sadoimpacto 2025-04-19 12:20 p.m.
I’ll have a decision soon
sadoimpacto 2025-04-19 01:18 p.m.ORDER AMENDING SENTENCING ORDER: Following the probation revocation hearing held on April 15, 2025, and upon a finding by a preponderance of the evidence that the Defendant violated the conditions of probation, the Court hereby REVOKES probation as to Count 1. The Defendant is resentenced to 25 minutes of imprisonment on Count 1, effective immediately. Probation as to Count 2 remains IN EFFECT under the original conditions set forth in the Sentencing Order dated April 12, 2025. Signed by District Judge sadoimpacto (SJI) (Entered: 04/19/2025)
@Funpark22 @ز @huddy. @JaroCycle
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:05 p.m.
sadoimpacto 2025-05-10 04:51 p.m.
This case is assigned to @andysofun (for the sole purpose of being a caretaker; no immediate action is required). Please note that the terms of probation end on 06/12/2025.
SENTENCING ORDER: https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1351430325754003476/1360738603021373460
SENTENCING ORDER: https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1351430325754003476/1360738603021373460
sadoimpacto used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-10 04:51 p.m. @meowiitten has added @andysofun to the case channel.
Case Modified
sadoimpacto used /transcript
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-09 03:20 p.m.
Creating transcript..
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-09 03:20 p.m.
https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1329678726383927409/1381714629436379186 Successfully created transcript.
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-09 03:20 p.m.
https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1329678726383927409/1381714633286488205 Successfully created transcript.
Exported 1121 messages